Re: [c-nsp] Is a 6500 still the best choice?

2011-04-26 Thread daigo nakayama
Hi, Now, the product that covers all requirements might have only CRS series. (A) MPLS = IOS XR (B) 10G high density = x20 10G Eth module (C) 100G = x1 100G Eth module Cat6500 is a realistic method if the stable operation is valued. However, the achievement of (B) and (C) are opaque, because

Re: [c-nsp] MPLS qos on 6500/sup720 - setting EXP when it shouldn't?

2010-11-17 Thread daigo nakayama
#sh mls qos detailed QoS ip packet dscp rewrite disabled globally If there is the following command in your config, the command might be a cause. no mls qos rewrite ip dscp --- nkymdg 2010/11/17 Phil Mayers p.may...@imperial.ac.uk: On 17/11/10 12:50, Manu Chao wrote: Can you please send

[c-nsp] Swap of startup-config with TCAM(CEF MAX) size change

2010-07-21 Thread daigo nakayama
Hi all, When startup-config is swapped with TCAM(CEF MAX) size change, RELOAD of two times is needed. It is automatically generated once of RELOAD of two times. Can this behavior be evaded? (I am looking for Method of reflecting all changes with RELOAD of one time. ) -- Catalyst6503E

Re: [c-nsp] Specification of RA that responds to RS (applied RA suppress I/F)

2010-07-05 Thread daigo nakayama
Hi, hsrp + ipv6 nd prefix default no-advertise + ipv6 nd ra suppress: = ra from each 'real' router - link local (2 default gateways) autoconfig / prefix announcment is OFF (Yay !) (A) ipv6 nd ra suppress command stops MULTICAST

Re: [c-nsp] Specification of RA that responds to RS (applied RA suppress I/F)

2010-06-18 Thread daigo nakayama
Hi, If you're looking to stop the responses to solicitation as well, put in both of these:  ipv6 nd ra suppress  ipv6 nd prefix default no-advertise When setting Cat65, I was not checking the command ipv6 nd prefix. I have not tested it yet. However, when the command reference is seen,

[c-nsp] Specification of RA that responds to RS (applied RA suppress I/F)

2010-06-16 Thread daigo nakayama
Hi, Cat65 interface(GigabitEthernet) sent out RA, when RS was received in the interface that applied ipv6 nd ra suppress. Is this behavior within specification ? Catalyst6503 SUP720-3BXL s72033-ipservicesk9_wan-vz.122-33.SXI3 I was not able to find a clear answer though I saw a similar