On Mon, 29 Sep 2014 21:06:59 +0300, Saku Ytti wrote:
On (2014-09-29 15:11 +0200), redscorpion69 wrote:
Not going into fact that this is breaking peering policy rules, is
there a
dynamic way to filter this on (Juniper/Cisco) ?
Some people put IXP in VRF where you only import your own customer
Configure the load balancing algorithm for the portchannel.
e.g.
switch(config)# port-channel load-balance ethernet {destination-ip |
destination-mac | destination-port | source-dest-ip | source-dest-mac |
source-dest-port | source-ip | source-mac | source-port}
Cisco uses source-dest-mac as
I'd be reluctant to expose my control plane out to a CPE
To provide redundancy & L2VPN services, LACP + 802.1ad would suffice,
and would allow you to keep the MPLS control plane in equipment you have
absolute control over i.e. PE routers.
Cheer
You sure you didn't intend 255.255.255.0?
i.e. a /24 range?
On Thu, 18 Apr 2013 22:21:17 -0700, sky vader wrote:
Hello,
when using the following mask errors out as bad mask when used on an
interface.
labasa(config-if)# ip address 10.0.10.100 255.0.255.255
ERROR: Bad mask 255.0.255.255 for add
Have you tried this?
int x.x
switchport mode fex-fabric
Cheers,
Gordon
On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 20:46:00 -0400, David Hubbard wrote:
I've got two 6120XP's and lots of left over Avago 10gig SFP's
from an EMC deployment where too many were purchased. I
tried to install a couple in
n the global table. This for me seems the simplest, most
supportable and widely deployed option.
This was originally my intention some time ago butI thought I'd at least
consider other options.
Thanks again
Gordon
From: Gert Doering
To: Saku Ytti
Cc:
you use another
method altogether.
I'm really looking for the best of both worlds - a nice scure core that isn't
easy to attack while at the same time not annoying customers by denying them
important diagnostic information.
Thanks
Gordon
From: Ge
of things.
In terms of Internet services, I was planning on delivering these in an
Internet VRF and there is no requirement for a full routing table yet
Thanks
Gordon
From: Andrey Petrenko
To: Andrew Miehs
Cc: Gordon Bryan ; Cisco NSP
Sent: Sunday, 10
ure from the outside?
Many thanks
Gordon
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
support a
virtualised environment. Are there any particular features I should be looking
for or are there any gotchas that I should be aware of? My exposure to VMs is
very limited so I'm hoping that the expertise available on this group can guide
me
Thanks in a
Gordon
From: Gert Doering
To: Gordon Bryan
Cc: "cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net"
Sent: Thursday, 29 November 2012, 19:47
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Recommended P Nodes
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 07:27:37PM +0000, Gordon Bryan wrote:
> Current thoug
#x27;m still at the early
stages of planning
Thanks in advance
Gordon
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
ncing something similar?
Tks/rgds
Gordon
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Hi,
The other end is a GSR, but I do not have control on.
Anyhow performed emergency upgrade my 7600 from SRD3 to SRE1, did the trick.
It now works without any problems.
Thanks to all.
Best Regards
Gordon
-Original Message-
From: John van Oppen [mailto:jvanop...@spectrumnet.us]
Sent
over 1G
Any ideas?
Thanks/Regards
Gordon
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Hi,
Has anyone got dot1q-tunnel to work on SRC, because
Same config but between 6500 (12.1(27b)E3) and 7600 (12.2(33)SRB) works
fine,
But when I try to do it between 7600 (12.2(33)SRB) and 7600 (12.2(33)SRC).
Any ideas?
___
cisco-nsp mailing list ci
Cacti has a plugin called mactrack that will do this.
On Thu, 9 Oct 2008 13:59:27 -0400
kcc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all
>
> ls any software / command to find out the ip address of the computer
> which is connecting to switch portxx
>
> I want to check this ip of server when the switch po
#
Will switch completely to software routing, or just switch the
Excess routes to software routing? Or will it drop routes or worst
Still crash!?
Also is there a best practice on changing the default maximum routes
Allocations?
Thanks
Gordon
___
cisco
that this is doubling the usage of my resources. Is there a
way to reduce it,
i.e reduce or disable the creation of the mpls?
Thanks in advance
Best regards
Gordon
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman
I've had pretty good luck with nedi so far:
http://www.nedi.ch/
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 09:56:42 -0400
chip <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So far all of the software that's been presented will autodiscover
> devices and backup configs and such. Is there anything around that
> will actually take inven
2055.
My linux box has been up for 157days already and flow-fanout never crashed
:-)
Hope it helps
Brgds
Gordon
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 11:18, Drew Weaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hi there, we have equipment at our edge that requires us to
export our netflow to it
and can advise
Me about it?
Thanks in advance
Regards
Gordon
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
ver enable traps bgp state-changes
snmp-server enable traps hsrp
snmp-server enable traps sonet
snmp-server enable traps envmon fan shutdown supply temperature status
snmp-server host A.B.C.D monitor
snmp ifmib ifindex persist
c7600a#
Thanks/
Gordon
___
hat is happening. Maybe it is something stupid, but
I just cannot see it.
Please help.
Best Regards
Gordon Bezzina
Eg.
interface Loopback1
description CATS-Group
ip address a.a.a.a 255.255.255.248
!
interface ATM2/0/0.307 point-to-point
ip unnumbered Loopback1
ip flow ingress
atm route-brid
an unnecessary upgrade a year down the line, it would be
better.
Thanks in advance
Regards
Gordon
___
cisco-nsp mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
25 matches
Mail list logo