Thanks
good point on LACP Fast, we'll test it.
RSTP should be in any case slower than 3 seconds with LACP FAST.
Cheers
James
Il giorno lun 6 mag 2024 alle ore 15:22 Saku Ytti ha scritto:
> On Mon, 6 May 2024 at 15:53, james list via cisco-nsp
> wrote:
>
> > The qu
dear experts
a customer of mine has a legacy environment with 4 x Cisco 9500 (IOS XE
17.09.03) connected in a square mode with 2 links (2 per each connection)
and each couple of links is considered a single virtual port (port-channel).
Loops are managed with PVSTP.
Two x C9500 are in DC1 while the
hi
I'd like to test with LACP slow, then can see if physical interface still
flaps...
Thanks for your support
Il giorno dom 11 feb 2024 alle ore 18:02 Saku Ytti ha
scritto:
> On Sun, 11 Feb 2024 at 17:52, james list wrote:
>
> > - why physical interface flaps in DC1 if it i
: Interface
Ethernet1/44 is down (Initializing)
Il giorno dom 11 feb 2024 alle ore 14:36 Saku Ytti ha
scritto:
> On Sun, 11 Feb 2024 at 15:24, james list wrote:
>
> > While on Juniper when the issue happens I always see:
> >
> > show log messages | last 440 | match LACPD_TIMEOUT
e
> related problems.
>
> Is this always the order of events? Does it always happen with Juniper
> noticing problems receiving LACP PDU first?
>
>
> On Sun, 11 Feb 2024 at 14:55, james list via juniper-nsp
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > 1) cable has
Hi
1) cable has been replaced with a brand new one, they said that to check an
MPO 100 Gbs cable is not that easy
3) no errors reported on both side
2) here the output of cisco and juniper
NEXUS1# sh interface eth1/44 transceiver details
Ethernet1/44
transceiver is present
type is QSFP-
50
et-0/1/5 Partner 32768 b0:8b:cf:83:49:5b 32768
429 100
Il giorno dom 11 feb 2024 alle ore 13:07 Gert Doering
ha scritto:
> HI,
>
> On Sun, Feb 11, 2024 at 12:50:32PM +0100, james list wrote:
> > 2024 Feb 9 16:39:36 NEXUS1 %ETHPORT-5-IF_DOWN_PORT_CHANN
session exchange the same amount of routing updates
>> across the links?
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Feb 11, 2024, 21:09 james list via cisco-nsp <
>> cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net> wrote:
>>
>> > Dear experts
>> > we have a couple of BGP pe
he DC1 and DC2 bgp session exchange the same amount of routing updates
> across the links?
>
>
> On Sun, Feb 11, 2024, 21:09 james list via cisco-nsp <
> cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net> wrote:
>
>> Dear experts
>> we have a couple of BGP peers over a 100 Gbs interconnec
heers
James
Il giorno dom 11 feb 2024 alle ore 11:12 Gert Doering
ha scritto:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Feb 11, 2024 at 11:08:29AM +0100, james list via cisco-nsp wrote:
> > we notice BGP flaps
>
> Any particular error message? BGP flaps can happen due to many different
> reasons,
Dear experts
we have a couple of BGP peers over a 100 Gbs interconnection between
Juniper (MX10003) and Cisco (Nexus N9K-C9364C) in two different datacenters
like this:
DC1
MX1 -- bgp -- NEXUS1
MX2 -- bgp -- NEXUS2
DC2
MX3 -- bgp -- NEXUS3
MX4 -- bgp -- NEXUS4
The issue we see is that sporadical
JNPR from 30s to 1s, but not CSCO. I'm not sure if this
> is the only problem, as insufficient data is shown about the state and
> LACP PDUs.
>
> I believe the command is 'lacp rate fast' or 'lacp period short', to
> reduce risk of operators getting bored,
Dear expert
we've an issue in setting up a port-channel between a Juniper EX4400 and a
Cisco Nexus N9K-C93180YC-EX over an SX 1 Gbs link.
We've implemented the following configuration but on Juniper side it is
interface flapping while on Cisco side it remains down.
Light levels seem ok.
Has anyon
RFC (=law) I'd expect those are followed, otherwise you cannot
complain, am I wrong ?
James
Il giorno dom 23 gen 2022 alle ore 18:37 Gert Doering
ha scritto:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Jan 23, 2022 at 06:31:40PM +0100, james list wrote:
> > thanks for the feedback.
> >
> &
point of view, since RFC6691 state "MUST use 536", the customer is
not compliant.
What do you think ?
Cheers
Il giorno dom 23 gen 2022 alle ore 17:40 Gert Doering
ha scritto:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Jan 23, 2022 at 05:10:42PM +0100, james list wrote:
> > I suspect the current Cis
Dear experts,
I have tcp adjust-mss configured on an internet link with an ISP like
following:
interface GigabitEthernet0/0/0
description internet WAN link
ip address x.x.x.x 255.255.255.252
ip tcp adjust-mss 1436
During DDOS attacks our firewall starts SYN challenge (acting as a proxy)
and
Hi
just tested and police rate x pps is only applicable to control plane
Cheers
Il giorno mer 8 set 2021 alle ore 15:51 Lukasz Bromirski <
luk...@bromirski.net> ha scritto:
> Saku is always on point ;)
>
> > On 8 Sep 2021, at 15:31, Saku Ytti wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 8 Sept 2021 at 16:30, Lukasz
Thanks
I would try to apply both Bps OR pps if possible
Cheers
Il Mer 8 Set 2021, 15:51 Lukasz Bromirski ha scritto:
> Saku is always on point ;)
>
> > On 8 Sep 2021, at 15:31, Saku Ytti wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 8 Sept 2021 at 16:30, Lukasz Bromirski
> wrote:
> >
> >>> 3) is there any mode to l
Dear experts,
I'd like to rate limit some ingress traffic coming from untrusted source to
10Mbs.
I've an ASR1001X (16.3.7) and this is the config I'd place:
*
ip access-list extended ACL_10_203_231_129
permit ip any host 10.203.231.129
class-map match-all CM_LIMIT_INGRESS
Hi
I've to ask for the VM routing table and then I will share.
VM gateway is load balancer.
Cheers
James
Il giorno gio 29 lug 2021 alle ore 18:17 Ryan Rawdon ha
scritto:
>
> > On Jul 29, 2021, at 11:55 AM, james list wrote:
> >
> >
> > Internet - Fire
Dear experts
My customer has the following very simple infrastructure:
Internet - Firewall – Lan - Load balancer – Lan – hypervisor- VM
It happens sometime that the VM do not respond anymore to Load balancer for
external ip addresses until on the Load balancer it is setted to source NAT
(SNA
Dear experts
I've a netflow configured on ASR1001X which is sending indeed udp packet to
collector but not displaying anything on the statistics, any idea why ?
Config:
flow exporter EXP_LOGS
destination 10.101.11.119
source Port-channel5.99 (this is the ip address used to send netflow
packet
Dear experts,
do you have any suggestion where I can find useful information over www in
order to provide DC interconnection of my two merging customers where one
is running MPLS/VPLS with Juniper technology and the other one EVPN/VXLAN
with Cisco ?
The customer would like to explore the possibili
Dear all,
Many times my security team requires to have in place layer2 segregation in
order to create dmz on the firewall as security measure to prevent lateral
movement in case of different vlan management or to respect standards (pci,
nist, etc).
The result is in having hundreds or thousands vla
km
Cheers
Il giorno gio 21 mag 2020 alle ore 06:41 Saku Ytti ha
scritto:
> On Wed, 20 May 2020 at 23:45, james list wrote:
>
> Hey,
>
> > Dear experts
> > my customer have some multicast flows which are detected sometime with
> > peaks/latency.
>
> > They r
Dear experts
my customer have some multicast flows which are detected sometime with
peaks/latency.
They measure this latency based on protocol financial feed timestamp which
I'm not able to decode (I guess they use stuff like Corvil).
The path from the market datafeed source to the customer is:
Many times we recognize issues on internet, customer asking why additional
delays are experienced, why it takes so long to access services, why "this
afternoon is slow", we notice fresh bgp updates, etc etc...
Everybody should know internet is cheap but unrealiable, customers many
times would like
?
We decided to add a link with the same carrier and we are aware we will not
reach 50/50 balancing.
What about RAM memory? Don t you see any issue?
Cheers
Il Dom 8 Mar 2020, 08:48 james list ha scritto:
> Dear all
> I'd like to have your recommandation.
>
> Our customer ru
Dear all
I'd like to have your recommandation.
Our customer runs on ASR1001X an EBGP peering (full routing) with one ISP
and some internal IBGP peering (full routing) with other sites of the
customer.
ASR1001xxx#sh ip bgp summary
BGP router identifier 185.x.xxx, local AS number 12111
BGP table ve
RPs are expring and needed to be refreshed every 30 mins
> interval. For multicast, check if any prune or joins are happening around
> the time. Any IGMP joins or prunes around the same time.
>
> On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 9:38 AM james list wrote:
>
>> Dear experts
>>
>&g
Can you elaborate?
Why just every 30 minutes the issue?
Il Mar 2 Ott 2018, 20:34 Tom Beecher ha scritto:
> You have switches with completely different buffer depths than you used
> to. You prob want to look into that.
>
> On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 9:39 AM james list wrote:
>
Dear experts
I’ve a strange issue.
Our customer replaced two L2/3 switches (C6500) where a pure L2 and L3
(hsrp) environment was set-up with a couple of new MX9k running the same L2
and L3 services but those two MX are running MPLS/VPLS to transport L3/L2
frames. Access switches are QFX5k connect
Thanks Saku/Lukas
Investigation still on going I will let you know if something is found.
Cheers
Il Mar 11 Set 2018, 00:20 Saku Ytti ha scritto:
> Oh I think I misunderstood OP. Yes, sounds like larger packets were
> impacted smaller were not.
>
> On Tue, 11 Sep 2018 at 01:16, Saku Ytti wrote:
Dear experts
I'm wondering if you can provide any hints/help on this problem.
We experienced a strange issue in reaching the remote devices (servers) and
perforiming bulk snmp walk, instead direct object query was working fine.
After an entire nigth of issues (22pm to 6am), the problem disappeare
Just one but hundreds of dhcp scopes.
Cheers
Il Sab 16 Giu 2018, 10:55 ha scritto:
> How many physical interfaces/ports?
>
> A c891f could be sufficient...
>
> Jürgen.
> -Original Message-
> Dear experts,
> a customer of mine as an old C7200 acting as DHCP server and wants to
> replace
th a much
> cheaper software router like a ISR43xx
> Do you mean the catylyst 9300 series?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: cisco-nsp On Behalf Of james
> list
> Sent: Friday, June 15, 2018 1:19 PM
> To: cisco-nsp NSP
> Subject: [c-nsp] DHCP server
>
> This message or
Dear experts,
a customer of mine as an old C7200 acting as DHCP server and wants to
replace it with an IOS device in order to port configuration 1:1.
He asked for a solution which is not so expensive, I'm thinking to ASR1k or
CAT9k, do you have any other suggestion ?
Thanks for any advice
Cheers
Dear experts
I have a strange behaviour to share.
I am testing ISSU and failover of a couple of 4500x configured in VSS.
Basically what I see is that during the failover the active supervisor (or
switc) takes more than 100 seconds to forward ip packets, making routing
convergence is very slow.
S
Dear experts,
I am wondering if anybody has clear the process to upgrade an ASR1001X from
ip base to advanced ip.
I need to enable BFD on BGP and seems that an upgrade is needed.
I'd like to know if it's right to use or we need to buy a new license.
Thanks for a feedback
Cheers
James
__
Dear experts,
I’m trying to get working macsec between Cisco 3850 and Juniper EX4300
without success.
Here the config:
Cisco 3850
key chain test macsec
key 123ABC
cryptographic-algorithm aes-128-cmac
!
interface TenGigabitEthernet1/0/21
switchport access vlan 10
switchport mode acce
rrors : 0
TTL failures : 8688776
MTU failures : 0
Total packets L3 Processed by all Modules: 1710516850594 @ 57716 pps
2018-03-02 11:22 GMT+01:00 James Bensley :
> On 1 March 2018 at 09:53, james list wrote:
> > xxx#show ibc
bal Registers:
global_cfg = 0x20 mis_init_sts = 0xF
dimm_parm_cfg_hi = 0x0576 dimm_parm_cfg_lo = 0x42040F5A
tm_init_size_cfg = 0x8000
xxx#
2018-03-01 10:02 GMT+01:00 James Bensley :
> On 1 March 2018 at 08:29, james list wrote:
> > D
;
> Replace 'slot 5' with your port SUP port number.
>
>
> On 1 March 2018 at 10:29, james list wrote:
> > Dear experts,
> > has anybody experienced a 100% SP CPU usage on C6500-Sup720
> (12.2(33)SXI5)
> > with a lot of interrupts ?
> > The main process
Dear experts,
has anybody experienced a 100% SP CPU usage on C6500-Sup720 (12.2(33)SXI5)
with a lot of interrupts ?
The main process is Heartbeat.
Cisco TAC is struggling in having an idea to sorting out the issue, they
are working since 3 days on it..
STP is stable, no mac moving, no real issue
Dear all,
For cve related to Meltdown and Spectre I'm wondering to know what are you
doing or going to do on your networking gears?
I'm struggling to understand something from vendors but I'd like to hear
from people in the pitch.
Cheers
James
___
cisco
Can only confirm to be in delay by two weeks now and still not got a
delivery date by Cisco
Big issues with end of year invoicing.
Cheers
James
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
Dear expert
I ve the following strange issue.
In the same broadcast domain (10.1.0.0/24) I have four devices:
1) carrier router .1
2) firewallA .2
3) firewallB .3
4) firewallC .4
Carrier router has a default route to .2 (firewall A).
2-3-4) has gateway to .1
If I made traceroute to a wan locat
Dear experts,
the bug CSCdy72539 states that on Cisco 6500 with SUP720 if are created
multiple GRE interfaces using the same source address traffic is switched
in CPU instead of hardware, it seems the issue is solved with SUP2T.
The question: can ASR1001X suffer of the same issue ?
I’m not able to
Dear experts,
the bug CSCdy72539 states that on Cisco 6500 with SUP720 if are created
multiple GRE interfaces using the same source address traffic is switched
in CPU instead of hardware, it seems the issue is solved with SUP2T.
The question: can ASR1001X suffer of the same issue ?
I’m not able to
Dear experts,
Has anybody already approached the PTP monitoring requested by MIDIF 2 ?
---
Article 4 of RTS 25 states :
Compliance with the maximum divergence requirements
Operators of trading venues and their members or participants shall
establish a system of traceability t
+02:00 Peter Rathlev :
> On Tue, 2017-05-23 at 15:22 +0200, james list wrote:
> > I’ve a customer switch C3750 (12.2(35)), is there a way to permit on
> > a specific port only a group of mac address which could generate
> > traffic towards the switch ?
> >
> > I’
GMT+02:00 Peter Rathlev :
> On Tue, 2017-05-23 at 15:22 +0200, james list wrote:
> > I’ve a customer switch C3750 (12.2(35)), is there a way to permit on
> > a specific port only a group of mac address which could generate
> > traffic towards the switch ?
> >
> > I’ve
Dear experts,
I’ve a customer switch C3750 (12.2(35)), is there a way to permit on a
specific port only a group of mac address which could generate traffic
towards the switch ?
I’ve tried mac acl but I do not get the expected result.
Any idea, example or www reference is appreciated.
Thanks in
as
well if the traffic is flowing asymmetrically.
Best Regards
Ted
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
james list
Sent: den 29 mars 2017 17:31
To: cisco-nsp NSP ; Juniper List <
juniper-...@puck.nether.net>
Subject: [c-nsp] traf
Hi experts
I’ve a couple active-passive firewall clusters (both with two member-A and
member-B) in two different localtions connected with two different WAN
links (WAN-A and WAN-B).
One cluster in site A has firewall member-A as active and the router/switch
(C6500 not in VSS) with WAN link A as HS
Dear experts,
I'm looking for hands on experience in interconnecting a huge cisco network
(>400 vlan) running PVST+ with some arista boxes which in principle as
default uses MST but in theory could interact with Cisco proprietary PVST+.
Despite the arista document which confirm the interop, has a
Hi experts,
I've a customer which experienced a big trouble since one of the server
system engineer in the company has assigned to a test server the same ip
address of the firewall cluster.
They do not have networking resources and got time to understand the issue.
My question: is there a way to
--Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
james list
Sent: Wednesday, February 8, 2017 4:17 PM
To: cisco-nsp NSP
Subject: [c-nsp] C3850 and NAT
Dear experts,
I'm wondering if anybody can give detailed or experienced info about NAT
support on
Dear experts,
I'm wondering if anybody can give detailed or experienced info about NAT
support on c3850.
I m not able to find any info on feature set but on the web is not so
clear... I'm looking a cheapest, in respect to 6500 or 68xx, switch able to
support NAT (not a router).
Thank you in advan
Dear expert
I’m having a look to a scenario in order to find the best matching (and
cheapest) device.
I need at least 3 x 10 Gbs interface (one in ingress and 2 in egress
port-channel) and to support functionalities such as:
- BGP
- Mcast PIM
- Mcast proxy register
- NAT
- 10 Gbs throughput
ll it work, yes. Will it work well, I doubt
>> it.
>>
>>
>> Matthew Huff | 1 Manhattanville Rd
>> Director of Operations | Purchase, NY 10577
>> OTA Management LLC | Phone: 914-460-4039
>> aim: matthewbhuff| Fax: 914-694-5669
application that uses
> the multicast data.
>
>
>
>
>
> Matthew Huff | 1 Manhattanville Rd
>
> Director of Operations | Purchase, NY 10577
>
> OTA Management LLC | Phone: 914-460-4039
>
> aim: matthewbhuff | Fax: 914-69
ment LLC | Phone: 914-460-4039
> aim: matthewbhuff| Fax: 914-694-5669
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
> > james list
> > Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2016 10:45 AM
> > T
Dear experts,
I’ve a multicast financial market connected to my infrastructure, I’ve been
informed that a new data multicast flow could reach up to 6 Gbs, so an huge
amount of traffic needs to be replicated.
Market is connected to an ASR 1001, than to a C6807-XL and customers are
connected to C65
.nether.net] On Behalf Of
> james list
> Sent: Friday, October 7, 2016 1:44 PM
> To: Pete Templin
> Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] stange vlan 1 output
>
> There is firewall on the other side...
>
> Thanks all for the hints!
>
> Il 07/Ott/2016 1
n that platform do this
> a lot where the 4948 participates in DTP enough for the other side to drop
> to access but the 4948 forgets to match it.
>
>
> On 10/7/2016 9:17 AM, james list wrote:
>
>> Hi experts,
>>
>> an issue on my c6500 sup720 12.2(33)SXI5.
>>
is the perfect time to run
>
> sh int g8/45 switchport
> sh int g9/27 switchport
>
> to get configured values VS negotiations
>
> -Original Message-
> From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
> james list
> Sent: Friday, October
Hi experts,
an issue on my c6500 sup720 12.2(33)SXI5.
I have two equal trunk configuration ports:
xxx#sh run int g8/45
interface GigabitEthernet8/45
switchport
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport trunk allowed vlan 269
switchport mode trunk
logging event link-status
l
Hi experts,
on my running C6500 in one of the PoP I've configured redundancy with dual
Sup-2T.
Now I'm going to add a new C6500 and want to remove one Sup from running
C6500 and to insert in the new one.
The questions:
1) do you suggest to keep redundancy enabled also with one Sup in the
current
Hi experts!
More than a vendor related question I’m wondering to discuss or get hints
regarding the upcoming mifid2 new PTP request (max divergence from UTC of 1
microsecond) implementation that will be requested since Jan 2018.
I’d like to setup in my DC two fully redundant PTP source, for this
> You may also want to set 'mls ip cef load-sharing full'.
>
> Mack McBride | Senior Network Architect | ViaWest, Inc.
> O: 720.891.2502 | C: 303.720.2711 | mack.mcbr...@viawest.com |
> www.viawest.com
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: cisco-nsp [mailt
That is not unfortunately so adaptive to understand that a link is full and
change for other sessions... :-(
2016-07-22 13:18 GMT+02:00 James Ventre :
>
> On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 3:45 AM, james list wrote:
>
>> 2) What if I would change hashing from fixed to adaptive ? a
Dear experts,
I need help.
On my C6500 sup720 (12.2(33)SXI5) I’ve a port channel 4 x 1Gbs with 1 Gbs
full and hashing fixed.
On the port-channel I’m trunking with few L2 vlans and on top of one of
those I’ve L3 (with OSPF).
Since hashing is fixed all the traffic that 6500 Asic has decided to
esses to the SP but I doubt they have interest in reviving
> the old platform.
>
> 70% is nothing really, I wouldn't worry about it until it's over 95%
>
> On 6/30/2016 12:18 PM, james list wrote:
>
>> Dear experts,
>> just to ask if there are any guidance or best pr
Dear experts,
just to ask if there are any guidance or best practice about process memory
utilization, currently on my C6500 I'm at 70% usage and would like to know
if I need to be alterted or not...
I use this box for full routing table (BGP process is the higher memory
user)...
Kind regards
Jam
Hi
I've two 6500 (6500-A and 6500-B) in production as VTP server, access
switch are 3750 or 4500 as VTP clients.
Today if I add manually a vlan on one of the two VTP server (ie on 6500-A)
it's propagated to the other server (6500-B) and clients.
The question is: do I've to add manually on both VT
yes, in general I see your points, I was wondering if there could be a
reasonable reason for the mentioned behaviour
2016-05-31 16:33 GMT+02:00 Nick Hilliard :
> james list wrote:
> > Apparently the Cisco gear has disabled one out of the two ten giga
> > interface after some
dear experts
I've a Cisco 6500 (12.2(33)) connected to a juniper EX4200 with a 2 x 10Gb
port channel.
Apparently the Cisco gear has disabled one out of the two ten giga
interface after some flapping of the other one and due to UDLD that is
currently non configured as aggressive nor bidirectional (
Dear experts
I've a BGP question. I've a router peering with a customer of mine, plain
EBGP no MPLS, see following chain as example:
myroutera --ebgp-- myrouterB --ebgp-- myrouterC --ebgp-- mycustomerA
--ebgp-- mycustomer_BGP_worldwide_network
Between myrouterX I use EBGP with private AS, now I'v
rt Doering" ha scritto:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 07:34:16PM +0100, james list wrote:
> > I'd use cisco 3850/3750 in stack but i m not sure this is the right
> choice.
>
> The problem is that what you're asking for is nearly impossible, so
> coming up
Hi,
>
> On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 06:25:29PM +0100, james list wrote:
> > well indeed I've asked for network expert suggestion, not for my father
> > suggestion...
>
> Where can I send my invoice?
>
> You get paid for your customer to do this design, so if you want
h your best guess, and we'll confirm/deny whether you're on
> the right track.
>
> On 2/3/2016 7:38 AM, james list wrote:
>
>> I’d like to have an hint if possible…
>>
>> For a project I’ve to provide a LAN solution to my customer with a mix of
>> 1
>
Dear experts,
I’d like to have an hint if possible…
For a project I’ve to provide a LAN solution to my customer with a mix of 1
Gbs copper and 10 Gbs copper ports (let say 20 x 1 Gbs and 30 x 10 Gbs
ports) plus a firewalling solution supporting feature like server load
balancing and reverse-prox
Thanks guys
2015-10-23 10:37 GMT+02:00 james list :
> Dear experts,
>
> a customer of mine is looking for a solution to stretch L2 point2point
> links over its L3 flat infrastructure, basically it has some L3 6500
> switches making its WAN networks and as routing protocol is
Dear experts,
a customer of mine is looking for a solution to stretch L2 point2point
links over its L3 flat infrastructure, basically it has some L3 6500
switches making its WAN networks and as routing protocol is using eBGP over
the wan links (no IGP at all... argh...).
On top of the requested
Hi gert
Good info.
>From customer requirements and pricing point of view the idea is to
replace with a nexus.
Regards
Il 06/feb/2015 19:45 "Gert Doering" ha scritto:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 03:16:26PM +0100, james list wrote:
> > do anybody have numb
Gents,
do anybody have numbers in terms of BGP sessions scalability oin C7600
SUP-720 ?
greetings
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-n
87 matches
Mail list logo
