Re: [c-nsp] subnet mask confusion?

I meant 255.0.255.255 sky On 04/18/2013 10:40 PM, Gordon Smith wrote: You sure you didn't intend 255.255.255.0? i.e. a /24 range? On Thu, 18 Apr 2013 22:21:17 -0700, sky vader wrote: Hello, when using the following mask errors out as bad mask when used on an interface. labasa(conf

Re: [c-nsp] subnet mask confusion?

wildcard masks are not the same. Subnet masks always have all ones in the network bits and all zeroes in the host bits. Wildcard masks use bit masking differently, and for different reasons. On Apr 18, 2013 10:32 PM, "sky vader" wrote: Hello, when using the following mask errors out a

[c-nsp] subnet mask confusion?

Hello, when using the following mask errors out as bad mask when used on an interface. labasa(config-if)# ip address 10.0.10.100 255.0.255.255 ERROR: Bad mask 255.0.255.255 for address 10.0.1.100 works on an access-list, labasa(config-if)#access-list 101 extended permit ip any 10.0.10.150

Re: [c-nsp] ASA: site-to-site vpn to cisco router.

-traffic permit inter-interface Still no luck. regards, sky On 10/27/2012 02:22 PM, Randy wrote: > Hello, > IIRC hairpinning is disabled by default on ASA. You have to enable via: > > "same-security traffic permit intra-interface" > > ./Randy > > ---

[c-nsp] ASA: site-to-site vpn to cisco router.

Hi, I have a very basic lab site to site vpn setup where I have a ASA 5505 running v7.2(4) on one side and a cisco 2811 on the other side. What my issue? I can't seem to ping from cisco 2811 to the 'inside' network of ASA (see config below) and can't seem to ping from ASA 'inside' network to the

[c-nsp] 12.4 IOS recommendation for 7206

Hi - Any recommendation for a stable enterprise IOS supporting following feature set. The role of this box is edge device, two ds3 feeds, bri (isdn) for backup, supporting, * voice * mpls * qos * ipsec 3des * ssh * netflow / ipsla * bgp / ospf * no memory leaks :-) Any personal experience from

Re: [c-nsp] Bandwidth Statement - Tunnel Interface

see in-line: Jay Hennigan wrote: > sky vader wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Just curious, since the default bandwidth for tunnel interface is 9k >> (cisco platform), does that mean the maximum bandwidth I can have is 9k? > > No. - So what does tun

[c-nsp] Bandwidth Statement - Tunnel Interface

Hi, Just curious, since the default bandwidth for tunnel interface is 9k (cisco platform), does that mean the maximum bandwidth I can have is 9k? What's the purpose of setting bandwidth statement on a tunnel interface? Does that mean I get bandwidth that is set or what the router will report via

[c-nsp] snmpwalk for switch port status

Hi, Can anyone point me in right direction for a perl script that will snmpwalk the MIB for switch port status whether "up" or "down" including total number of ports available? I have approximately 400 switches that I would like to query via script and pipe the results to a file for every device.