Re: [c-nsp] %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH - But they aren't connected!

2007-12-06 Thread Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET
> > Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote: > > >>> The setup looks like this : > >>> > >>> TRANSIT1 TRANSIT2 > >>>| | > >>>|-E0/0|-E1/0 > >>>| | > >>> - > >>> 36

Re: [c-nsp] %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH - But they aren't connected!

2007-12-03 Thread Jay Hennigan
Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote: >>> The setup looks like this : >>> >>> TRANSIT1 TRANSIT2 >>>| | >>>|-E0/0|-E1/0 >>>| | >>> - >>> 3640 >>> --

Re: [c-nsp] %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH - But they aren't connected!

2007-12-03 Thread Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET
> > Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote: > > > I'm not sure I explained myself correctly..(And I don't > > understand what your trying to accomplish above) > > > > The setup looks like this : > > > > TRANSIT1 TRANSIT2 > >| | > >|-E0/0

Re: [c-nsp] %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH - But they aren't connected!

2007-12-03 Thread Jay Hennigan
Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote: > I'm not sure I explained myself correctly..(And I don't > understand what your trying to accomplish above) > > The setup looks like this : > > TRANSIT1 TRANSIT2 >| | >|-E0/0|-E1/0 >

Re: [c-nsp] %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH - But they aren't connected!

2007-12-03 Thread Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET
> You'll often see that problem when there are non-Cisco layer 2 devices > between the neighbors. > > Some non-Cisco gear relays CDP frames out all interfaces which results > in CDP reporting direct connections which in reality are not. The only > workaround of which I am aware is to disable C

Re: [c-nsp] %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH - But they aren't connected!

2007-12-03 Thread Mikael Abrahamsson
On Sun, 2 Dec 2007, Jay Hennigan wrote: > Some non-Cisco gear relays CDP frames out all interfaces which results I would say ALL non-cisco devices will relay CDP frames (and rightly so). Only exception would be if someone else also implemented CDP. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: [EMAIL PROTEC

Re: [c-nsp] %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH - But they aren't connected!

2007-12-03 Thread Tassos Chatzithomaoglou
"no cdp advertise-v2" will stop these messages, since the "unmatching duplex" reporting functionality (+ native vlan mismatch) has been added in CDP v2. -- Tassos Jay Hennigan wrote on 3/12/2007 7:30 πμ: > Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I'm getting on a 3640 running (C3640-JK9S-M)

Re: [c-nsp] %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH - But they aren't connected!

2007-12-02 Thread Jay Hennigan
Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote: > Hi, > > I'm getting on a 3640 running (C3640-JK9S-M), Version 12.4(13a) : > > Dec 1 13:07:26 EST: %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH: duplex mismatch discovered on > Ethernet0/0 (not full duplex), with c2924-1.house.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com > FastEthernet0/15 (full dupl

[c-nsp] %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH - But they aren't connected!

2007-12-02 Thread Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET
Hi, I'm getting on a 3640 running (C3640-JK9S-M), Version 12.4(13a) : Dec 1 13:07:26 EST: %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH: duplex mismatch discovered on Ethernet0/0 (not full duplex), with c2924-1.house.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com FastEthernet0/15 (full duplex). The problem is that E0/0