Hi all,
I am having problems with a particular device going down every 3-4 days.
The switchport for which this device is connected to is telling me it is
having a lot of "output drops" e.g.
Input queue: 0/2000/0/0 (size/max/drops/flushes); Total output drops:
13342805
I 'suspect' that these
Wilkinson, Alex wrote:
> can anyone recommed a tool to 'blast' this particular interface
TTCP with UDP traffic, best directed at a null-routed IP address on the
other side of that interface.
Pay careful attention to the order of command-line parameters or weird
things will happen.
If you want
What is the configuration of that interface and can you provide
a 'sh int' between two drop periods?
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 02:22:31PM +0800, Wilkinson, Alex wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am having problems with a particular device going down every 3-4 days.
> The switchport for which this device is co
Have you tried 'hold-queue ...' command. This may resolves your problem.
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 11:22 AM, Wilkinson, Alex
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am having problems with a particular device going down every 3-4 days.
> The switchport for which this device is connected to is te
It is inadvisable to increase the output hold-queue as far as I am
aware, this could cause packets to be delayed on egress which could
cause TCP timeouts.
Dave.
Farhan Jaffer wrote:
> Have you tried 'hold-queue ...' command. This may resolves your problem.
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 11:22 AM
Hi Guys,
This really depends on the speed of the Interface and what is connected on the
other side.
We had a Serial Satellite link of 5M, which was never running higher than
4.5M - due to regular bursty traffic.
After increasing the queue (fair-queue 320 256 0) the link now does about
4.9M, w
0n Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 07:28:05AM -0400, Rodney Dunn wrote:
>What is the configuration of that interface and can you provide
>a 'sh int' between two drop periods?
>From 'running-config'
interface FastEthernet4/10
no snmp trap link-status
>From 'show int FastEthernet4/10'
Hard to say without more data.
What is connected to the FE port shouldn't have anything to do with the ATM
link status.
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 08:32:34AM +0800, Wilkinson, Alex wrote:
> 0n Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 07:28:05AM -0400, Rodney Dunn wrote:
>
> >What is the configuration of that
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 08:32:34AM +0800, Wilkinson, Alex wrote:
> Half-duplex, 10Mb/s
>
> You will note that it is "Half-duplex, 10Mb/s". That is no mistake since the
> device that is connected to this switch-port is only capable of 10Mb/s.
10Mb/s doesn't infer half-duplex though. are you sure
