AIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Christoph Loibl
> Sent: vrijdag 1 juni 2007 8:53
> To: Simon Leinen
> Cc: Danny; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] [Query] Bgp Session timers
>
> Hi!
>
> On Jun 1, 2007, at 12:21 AM, Simon Leinen wrote:
>
> > Arie Vayner
Hi!
On Jun 1, 2007, at 12:21 AM, Simon Leinen wrote:
> Arie Vayner \(avayner\) writes:
>> Danny,
>> With iBGP the timers for BGP are not really important... You
>> actually need to worry about the IGP convergence.
>> The reason for that is that usually when a link fails, you don't
>> really expec
Arie Vayner \(avayner\) writes:
> Danny,
> With iBGP the timers for BGP are not really important... You
> actually need to worry about the IGP convergence.
> The reason for that is that usually when a link fails, you don't
> really expect the BGP session to the RR to go down, but just use the
> red
urday, May 26, 2007 22:11 PM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] [Query] Bgp Session timers
Hello all ,
We are running a ISP with cisco boxes around 30 GSRs on the geography .
The boxes are on RR IBGP hireachial architecture
Can you guys suggest the best practices hold down and keep
Hello all ,
We are running a ISP with cisco boxes around 30 GSRs on the geography . The
boxes are on RR IBGP hireachial architecture
Can you guys suggest the best practices hold down and keepalive timers you set
for the IBGP sessions on your ISP network ??? .
Due you lower down the timers
