> Message: 3
> Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 14:05:25 +
> From: Holemans Wim
> To: "cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net"
> Subject: [c-nsp] 10G for 6506-E with Sup32-8Gb or replace with
> 4900M
>
> Based on the price, it seems we best opt to replace the 6506-
> E/Sup32 w
It is very interesting that a 2:1 8 port 10G X2 card is $37500 for
C6509 and $7500 for 4900M (+ has the ability to use Twingig). So I
would say if don't need the extension capacity of C6506-E go for
something smaller like 4900M.
Also if you will only need 2x10G in the future you also might explore
I don't think you can do the 1G distribution on the 4900M without converting
the 10G interfaces back to dual 1G. I have heard from others on the list that
this severely limits your queue sizes but. Ymmv. Beating the multi-vendor drum
this is a perfect use for the juniper ex4200 series. I have
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 02:05:25PM +, Holemans Wim wrote:
> Now we are thinking about connecting both routers to each other on each
> campus with a 10G connection. As the Sup32 don't have a 10G yet, we have
> multiple options to do so.
> We can add a 10G board to the chassis, replace the
We have 3 campus with on each campus a 6506-E/Sup720-10G as 'master router' and
a 6506/E-Sup32-8gbit as backup router, in a HSRP config. In each router we also
have GBIC boards to connect the different buildings. These Sup32 routers also
act as L2 concentrator for part of each campus.
Now we a
