Re: [c-nsp] 12008 GRPB memory problem.

2008-03-18 Thread Sridhar Ayengar
Lamar Owen wrote: > On Monday 17 March 2008, Buhrmaster, Gary wrote: >> Typically this means the DIMMs are "double sided", and the >> initialization routines either (a) cannot physically >> handle them due to physically wiring, or (b) need to be >> upgraded (boot rom) to recognize the double-sided

Re: [c-nsp] 12008 GRPB memory problem.

2008-03-18 Thread Lamar Owen
On Monday 17 March 2008, Buhrmaster, Gary wrote: > Typically this means the DIMMs are "double sided", and the > initialization routines either (a) cannot physically > handle them due to physically wiring, or (b) need to be > upgraded (boot rom) to recognize the double-sided > DIMM. The 256MB DIMM'

Re: [c-nsp] 12008 GRPB memory problem.

2008-03-17 Thread Buhrmaster, Gary
> I have 2 256M DIMMS installed. If I pull the second one it > says I only have > 128M. For some reason it is only seeing half the ram on each DIMM. Typically this means the DIMMs are "double sided", and the initialization routines either (a) cannot physically handle them due to physically wir

Re: [c-nsp] 12008 GRPB memory problem.

2008-03-17 Thread Max Pierson
- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Troy Beisigl Sent: Monday, March 17, 2008 11:38 AM To: 'Matt Addison'; 'e ninja'; 'Matt Liotta' Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 12008 GRPB memory problem. I have 2 256M DIMMS installed. If

Re: [c-nsp] 12008 GRPB memory problem.

2008-03-17 Thread Troy Beisigl
; Matt Liotta Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: RE: [c-nsp] 12008 GRPB memory problem. Have you installed a single 512M stick, or 2x 256M sticks? It may not be able to recognize the extra banks in a 512M DIMM and thus would only be able to see the first 256M of it. ~Matt -Original Message

Re: [c-nsp] 12008 GRPB memory problem.

2008-03-17 Thread Lamar Owen
On Monday 17 March 2008, Matt Addison wrote: > Have you installed a single 512M stick, or 2x 256M sticks? It may not be > able to recognize the extra banks in a 512M DIMM and thus would only be > able to see the first 256M of it. Yeah, those 256M DIMM's are pretty interesting. They're just like s

Re: [c-nsp] 12008 GRPB memory problem.

2008-03-17 Thread Matt Addison
: Friday, March 14, 2008 1:41 PM To: 'e ninja'; 'Matt Liotta' Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 12008 GRPB memory problem. Hmmm. Well I installed the RAM and it still thinks I have 256M instead of 512M. Checked and upgraded the ROMMON to version 2.2 and am running 1

Re: [c-nsp] 12008 GRPB memory problem.

2008-03-16 Thread Michael Smith
On Mar 14, 2008, at 10:40 AM, Troy Beisigl wrote: > Hmmm. Well I installed the RAM and it still thinks I have 256M > instead of > 512M. Checked and upgraded the ROMMON to version 2.2 and am running > 12.0(32)S8. Are there different versions of the GRP-B RPs? I know > for sure > that the RAM I

Re: [c-nsp] 12008 GRPB memory problem.

2008-03-14 Thread Troy Beisigl
ACTIVE (ACTV RP ) Insertion time: 00:00:04 (16:48:06 ago) DRAM size: 268435456 bytes Troy Beisigl _ From: e ninja [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 12:35 AM To: Matt Liotta Cc: Troy Beisigl; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 12008 GRPB

Re: [c-nsp] 12008 GRPB memory problem.

2008-03-12 Thread e ninja
looking at the log messages, the mallocfails were reported by the RP and not the linecards. /eninja On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 11:21 AM, Matt Liotta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You need to check each line card for memory using attach. Older GSRs > had line cards with 128M, which will certainly n

Re: [c-nsp] 12008 GRPB memory problem.

2008-03-11 Thread hjan
Troy Beisigl ha scritto: > > Mar 8 08:19:51: %FIB-2-FIBDOWN: CEF has been disabled due to a low memory > condition. > > It can be re-enabled by configuring "ip cef [distributed]" What about "sh ip cef summ" ? Hi, Gianluca ___ cisco-nsp mailing l

Re: [c-nsp] 12008 GRPB memory problem.

2008-03-10 Thread Troy Beisigl
@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 12008 GRPB memory problem. Troy Beisigl wrote: > Does anyone know why a 12008 with dual GRPBs with 256M each would run out of > memory with a single full BGP feed? We have a 7507 RSP4 with 256M and it > runs fine with about 50M free. The GSR runs out of m

Re: [c-nsp] 12008 GRPB memory problem.

2008-03-10 Thread Pete Templin
Troy Beisigl wrote: > Does anyone know why a 12008 with dual GRPBs with 256M each would run out of > memory with a single full BGP feed? We have a 7507 RSP4 with 256M and it > runs fine with about 50M free. The GSR runs out of memory and shuts off dCEF > and stops functioning when connected in plac

Re: [c-nsp] 12008 GRPB memory problem.

2008-03-10 Thread Matt Liotta
You need to check each line card for memory using attach. Older GSRs had line cards with 128M, which will certainly not be enough with full tables. -Matt On Mar 10, 2008, at 2:00 PM, Troy Beisigl wrote: > Does anyone know why a 12008 with dual GRPBs with 256M each would > run out of > memo

Re: [c-nsp] 12008 GRPB memory problem.

2008-03-10 Thread John van Oppen
e BGP table and the RIB the second is just the additional BGP routes. Thanks, John -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Troy Beisigl Sent: Monday, March 10, 2008 11:01 AM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] 12008 GRPB memory problem.

Re: [c-nsp] 12008 GRPB memory problem.

2008-03-10 Thread Troy Beisigl
-8500 X 1005 -Original Message- From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 10, 2008 11:21 AM To: Troy Beisigl Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 12008 GRPB memory problem. You need to check each line card for memory using attach. Older GSRs had line

[c-nsp] 12008 GRPB memory problem.

2008-03-10 Thread Troy Beisigl
Does anyone know why a 12008 with dual GRPBs with 256M each would run out of memory with a single full BGP feed? We have a 7507 RSP4 with 256M and it runs fine with about 50M free. The GSR runs out of memory and shuts off dCEF and stops functioning when connected in place if the 7507. We are upgrad