Re: [c-nsp] 3550-12 interrupts out of control, possibly hardware?

2012-08-18 Thread Andy Dills
Just to follow up on this on the off chance somebody runs into this in the future...a reload of the switch fixed the issue, and the traffic for the L3 port stopped hitting vlan 1. Andy On Thu, 16 Aug 2012, Andy Dills wrote: Thanks, I appreciate those suggestions. I verified both the SDM

[c-nsp] 3550-12 interrupts out of control, possibly hardware?

2012-08-16 Thread Andy Dills
I've got a customer with a weird situation. They have a pretty straightforward setup, two 7200s fronting two cisco 3550-12s, distributing to a series of 48 port 3550s. It's a bit dated, but works very well for their needs. They have one special network attached to (only) one of the copper

Re: [c-nsp] 3550-12 interrupts out of control, possibly hardware?

2012-08-16 Thread Andy Dills
In doing further investigation, looking at traffic graphs, I see that once they moved the network to the other switch, all of a sudden vlan1 started seeing all of the traffic that was being routed to that network. Typically, the only traffic the switches see on vlan1 is traffic actually

Re: [c-nsp] 3550-12 interrupts out of control, possibly hardware?

2012-08-16 Thread Tóth András
Hi Andy, One idea is different SDM templates being used. The SDM template is not showing up in running-config, and changing it requires a reload as well. I would compare them with 'sh sdm prefer' command. You might be running out of IPv4 routes, which causes rest of routes to be applied in

Re: [c-nsp] 3550-12 interrupts out of control, possibly hardware?

2012-08-16 Thread Andy Dills
Thanks, I appreciate those suggestions. I verified both the SDM and VTP configs are identical. Did you see my followup from earlier? I identified that for some reason unknown to me, the traffic was hitting the vlan1 interface before exiting via the L3 interface facing that network, which was

Re: [c-nsp] 3550-12 interrupts out of control, possibly hardware?

2012-08-16 Thread Tóth András
Hi Andy, The only thing which comes to my mind when you mention vlan 1 is that by default it is untagged. Therefore you might have some misconfig or miscabling or not having routing enabled, something similar which causes traffic from or to a routed port to arrive untagged which is interpreted as