ML wrote:
Metalíza wrote:
Peter Rathlev wrote:
On Mon, 2009-11-02 at 17:21 -0500, Ryan West wrote:
We're using a couple of 3560s for PBR with no problems forwarding
100 Mbps+. There's no CPU load from the forwarding itself. We
haven't tried actually pushing it yet but are planning to try
somet
Metalíza wrote:
Peter Rathlev wrote:
On Mon, 2009-11-02 at 17:21 -0500, Ryan West wrote:
We're using a couple of 3560s for PBR with no problems forwarding
100 Mbps+. There's no CPU load from the forwarding itself. We
haven't tried actually pushing it yet but are planning to try
sometime soon.
Peter Rathlev wrote:
On Mon, 2009-11-02 at 17:21 -0500, Ryan West wrote:
We're using a couple of 3560s for PBR with no problems forwarding
100 Mbps+. There's no CPU load from the forwarding itself. We
haven't tried actually pushing it yet but are planning to try
sometime soon.
The 3560 needs
Networking & Telecommunications Services
>
>
>
> Daniska, Tomas wrote:
> >>-Original Message-
> >>From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-
> >>boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Peter Rathlev
> >>Sent: Tuesday, N
...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Peter Rathlev
Sent: Tuesday, November 03, 2009 12:01 AM
To: Ryan West
Cc: cisco-nsp
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 3560/3750 policy routing
It has been running IOS 12.2(50)SE1 IP Services "all its life" (some
months).
When we started using it I was a little
> -Original Message-
> From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-
> boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Peter Rathlev
> Sent: Tuesday, November 03, 2009 12:01 AM
> To: Ryan West
> Cc: cisco-nsp
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 3560/3750 policy routing
>
On Mon, 2009-11-02 at 17:21 -0500, Ryan West wrote:
> > We're using a couple of 3560s for PBR with no problems forwarding
> > 100 Mbps+. There's no CPU load from the forwarding itself. We
> > haven't tried actually pushing it yet but are planning to try
> > sometime soon.
> >
> > The 3560 needs t
