On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 19:19:11 +0200, you wrote:
> I did actually mean xconnect configuration on a SVI. :-)
A 7600 chassis and ES+ cards will do that today.
It's probably less expensive than the SIP solution.
Plus, SR is IMO better software than SX. YMMV.
-A
__
On Tue, 2010-04-27 at 18:31 +0200, Asbjorn Hojmark - Lists wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 10:58:27 +0200, you wrote:
> > > Also, on a 7600 (SR software), you can run Mux UNI (a trunk with
> > > VLANs and sub-interfaces on the same interface), even on LAN
> > > cards. I don't remember off the top of m
On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 10:58:27 +0200, you wrote:
>> Also, on a 7600 (SR software), you can run Mux UNI (a trunk with VLANs
>> and sub-interfaces on the same interface), even on LAN cards. I don't
>> remember off the top of my head if that's supported on the 6500.
> It is, but won't help. You still
Thanks for the answers so far. We'll check with our AM to see if they
have any further details. :-)
On Tue, 2010-04-27 at 09:04 +0200, Peter Rathlev wrote:
> If one were to want xconnected SVIs and "real" VPLS on a 6500/Sup720,
> what would one need? We need 10G, and using SIP-600 as core facing
>
W dniu 2010-04-27 10:37, Asbjorn Hojmark - Lists pisze:
> Also, on a 7600 (SR software), you can run Mux UNI (a trunk with VLANs
> and sub-interfaces on the same interface), even on LAN cards. I don't
> remember off the top of my head if that's supported on the 6500.
Supported since 12.2(33)SXH
h
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 10:37:34AM +0200, Asbjorn Hojmark - Lists wrote:
> Also, on a 7600 (SR software), you can run Mux UNI (a trunk with VLANs
> and sub-interfaces on the same interface), even on LAN cards. I don't
> remember off the top of my head if that's supported on the 6500.
It is, b
On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 09:04:35 +0200, you wrote:
> If one were to want xconnected SVIs and "real" VPLS on a 6500/Sup720,
> what would one need? We need 10G, and using SIP-600 as core facing
> interfaces seems to be the only solution, albeit rather expensive.
Check with your account team if the ES+
Hi,
For some time we have used loop cables and port mode EoMPLS in order to
both to L2 transport over MPLS and L3 termination of the same VLAN. This
might sometimes result in supoptimal switching, since there's no (easy)
way to make the switches understand the way the L2 and L3 topology work
toget
