acceleration of FPM, and I'll
point out that the PISA doesn't add anything for stateful inspection.
Regards,
Brian
> -Original Message-
> From: Gustavo Novais [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2007 3:33 PM
> To: Brian Stiff (bstiff)
> Cc: cis
een placed...
Thank you all for your input
Gustavo Novais
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: terça-feira, 5 de Junho de 2007 23:28
To: Gustavo Novais
Cc: Brian Stiff (bstiff); cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 6500 with IOS Fire
On 6/5/07, Gustavo Novais <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'll suggest him to continue using its current pix525 cluster,
If they want to give the IOS Firewall a shot though for what a
dual-720 is going to cost, putting in a pair of 2821 or 2851 SEC-K9
bundle's with SDM shouldn't be too painful.
> D
On Jun 5, 2007, at 2:32 PM, Gustavo Novais wrote:
> Do you know if the sup32-PISA brings any improvement on the IOS
> firewall area?
Sup32 w/PISA provides up to 2gb/sec of stateless full-packet
filtering via hardware-accelerated Flexible Packet Matching (FPM).
It's always good to do as mu
de 2007 20:52
To: Gustavo Novais
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [c-nsp] 6500 with IOS Firewall - Any experiences?
Hi Gustavo-
I'd thought this had come up on the list before, but I couldn't find it
in the archives.
If you're really looking for performance, breadth of fea
Eng.
Security Technology Group
http://www.cisco.com/go/iosfw
> Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 20:59:47 +0100
> From: "Gustavo Novais" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: [c-nsp] 6500 with IOS Firewall - Any experiences?
> To:
> Message-ID:
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cont
Hi,
I currently have a customer who is buying a 6500 with redundant SUP720,
but he doesn't want to use the SUP for L3 (only L2) because currently
all of its L3 is done on a PIX525, on which he has lots of rules, and is
able to manage by ASDM.
He does not wish to buy a FWSM, so I told him that
