On 19/06/2024 9:38, Gert Doering wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 08:44:20AM +0300, Hank Nussbacher via cisco-nsp wrote:
RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:2024 Jun 19 05:12:47 : ipv4_acl_mgr[343]:
%ACL-IPV4_ACL-6-IPACCESSLOGP : access-list log-traffic (10) permit udp
192.114.102.104(55638) -> 192.0.2.2(53), 1 p
cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net (Gert Doering via cisco-nsp) wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 08:44:20AM +0300, Hank Nussbacher via cisco-nsp wrote:
> > RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:2024 Jun 19 05:12:47 : ipv4_acl_mgr[343]:
> > %ACL-IPV4_ACL-6-IPACCESSLOGP : access-list log-traffic (10) permit udp
> > 192.114.102.104
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 08:44:20AM +0300, Hank Nussbacher via cisco-nsp wrote:
> RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:2024 Jun 19 05:12:47 : ipv4_acl_mgr[343]:
> %ACL-IPV4_ACL-6-IPACCESSLOGP : access-list log-traffic (10) permit udp
> 192.114.102.104(55638) -> 192.0.2.2(53), 1 packet
You might actually have a clie
I find this highly unlikely.
I think you have a burden of proof that what you claim is actually
what is happening.
Do you have packet capture to show absence of stated traffic? And
existence of the expected packet in its stead?
On Wed, 19 Jun 2024 at 08:45, Hank Nussbacher via cisco-nsp
wrote:
I have a config like this:
interface GigabitEthernet0/0/0/43.1
ipv4 address 192.0.2.20 255.255.255.0
encapsulation dot1q 1
ipv4 access-group log-traffic ingress
ipv4 access-group log-traffic egress
!
ipv4 access-list log-traffic
10 permit ipv4 any any log
In the log I see:
RP/0/RSP0/CPU0
