On Wed, 25 Mar 2009, Pshem Kowalczyk wrote:
Hi,
We're considering getting some ASR (1004 and 1006) as peering routers.
I would like to know what sort of experience you had with them.
What are the advantages of running the 'modular' IOS XE? We tried the
'modular' software on 6500 and we ran
On Wed, 25 Mar 2009, Julio Arruda wrote:
- The device has more horse-power and potential capabilities than 7200 with
any NPE. It survived several DoS attacks, while 7200 died.
Interesting, the Control-plane in the IOS-XE, from what I understand, is not
the legacy piece IOS, correct ? Is
Hi,
We're considering getting some ASR (1004 and 1006) as peering routers.
I would like to know what sort of experience you had with them.
What are the advantages of running the 'modular' IOS XE? We tried the
'modular' software on 6500 and we ran into some issues that we didn't
have on the
Hi,
Thank you for the off-list replies. I've read some more documentation
regarding the ASRs and I'm a bit unsure what the advantages of running
a sub-packaged image are. According to the Cisco website:
Individual sub-package upgrades are atypical on the Cisco ASR 1000
Series Routers, because
