On 6/27/19 2:40 PM, Mark Tinka wrote:
On 27/Jun/19 21:22, Aaron Gould wrote:
Why are we worried about XR boot times ?
RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:g-9k#sh ver | in "uptime|IOS"
Thu Jun 27 14:20:49.013 CDT
Cisco IOS XR Software, Version 4.1.2[Default]
g-9k uptime is 5 years, 14 weeks, 3 days, 12 hours, 1
On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 12:31:54PM +0100, adamv0...@netconsultings.com wrote:
> I'd expect the boot(and install) of GISO from USB to be fairly quick.
>
> adam
I don't know about USB boot but installing GISO on live router (.iso copied
over to RP, then
install update command used) is about 1 hour
> Mark Tinka
> Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2019 8:41 PM
>
>
>
> On 27/Jun/19 21:22, Aaron Gould wrote:
>
> > Why are we worried about XR boot times ?
> >
> > RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:g-9k#sh ver | in "uptime|IOS"
> > Thu Jun 27 14:20:49.013 CDT
> > Cisco IOS XR Software, Version 4.1.2[Default] g-9k uptime
"Det är vad det är"
'It is what it is"?
A
Em 27/06/2019 16:41, "cisco-nsp em nome de Mark Tinka"
escreveu:
On 27/Jun/19 21:22, Aaron Gould wrote:
> Why are we worried about XR boot times ?
>
> RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:g-9k#sh ver | in "uptime|IOS"
> Thu Jun 27 14:
On 27/Jun/19 21:22, Aaron Gould wrote:
> Why are we worried about XR boot times ?
>
> RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:g-9k#sh ver | in "uptime|IOS"
> Thu Jun 27 14:20:49.013 CDT
> Cisco IOS XR Software, Version 4.1.2[Default]
> g-9k uptime is 5 years, 14 weeks, 3 days, 12 hours, 10 minutes
>
> RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:c-9
Why are we worried about XR boot times ?
RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:g-9k#sh ver | in "uptime|IOS"
Thu Jun 27 14:20:49.013 CDT
Cisco IOS XR Software, Version 4.1.2[Default]
g-9k uptime is 5 years, 14 weeks, 3 days, 12 hours, 10 minutes
RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:c-9k#sh ver | in "uptime|IOS"
Thu Jun 27 14:20:55.287 CDT
C
The NCS540 line is definitely edge focused although the initial hardware
release probably fits more in an aggregation role for most. There are
differences in feature or scale but I wouldn't say it's less feature rich, in
many cases it has more capabilities.
Thanks,
Phil
On 6/27/19, 1:21
Don't forget the PHD in rocket surgery required for smartnet
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp On Behalf Of Gert Doering
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2019 12:05 PM
To: ??ukasz Bromirski
Cc: Gert Doering ; Cisco-nsp (cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net)
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ASR 920 Replac
>There are currently no such plans, but the natural current replacement would
>be NCS 540 (IOS-XR box) and NCS 560 (XR box as well, more alike
>ASR 903/907 if you need modularity).
I was told that there are currently no plans to EoL the ASR920. The NCS, while
somewhat similar, is not quite as "fe
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 06:29:41PM +0200, Brian Turnbow wrote:
> Let's make a smu to disable smart licensing as a fix.
Now that is nice :-) IOS XR FTW.
(I still do not understand why more recent XR platforms can't have
EIGRP, though... we have nicely and willingly moved ourselves into
vendo
--- Begin Message ---
> The table on software licensing looks like the usual Cisco nightmare,
just more
> of it.
>
> ESS-AC-10G-RTU-1 Essentials SW Right-to-Use per 10G
> ADV-AC-10G-RTU-1 Advanced SW Right-to-Use per 10G
> ESS-10G-SIA-3 Essentials SW Innovation Access per 10G 3 year
subscription
>
A 920 taking 13 minutes too boot is quite a thing to see. Especially a dual
reboot for a software upgrade 😚
On Thu, Jun 27, 2019, 12:04 PM Gert Doering wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 06:02:15PM +0200, ??ukasz Bromirski wrote:
> > > The table on software licensing looks like the usual C
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 06:02:15PM +0200, ??ukasz Bromirski wrote:
> > The table on software licensing looks like the usual Cisco nightmare,
> > just more of it.
>
> Oh c???mon, what would happen if we???d nail down *both* product and
> licensing? Hell would freeze ;)
*sigh*. Well said.
(A
On 27/Jun/19 17:59, Łukasz Bromirski wrote:
> :D “Good old days of solid iron with QNX-running XR”.
>
> NCS 540 boots in ~90 seconds depending on the complexity of the
> configuration. I just did reboot one to check if I’m right.
And a full software upgrade?
Mark.
__
Gert,
> On 27 Jun 2019, at 18:00, Gert Doering wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 05:49:42PM +0200, ??ukasz Bromirski wrote:
>> There are currently no such plans, but the natural current replacement would
>> be NCS 540 (IOS-XR box) and NCS 560 (XR box as well, more alike
>> ASR 903/907
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 05:49:42PM +0200, ??ukasz Bromirski wrote:
> There are currently no such plans, but the natural current replacement would
> be NCS 540 (IOS-XR box) and NCS 560 (XR box as well, more alike
> ASR 903/907 if you need modularity).
The boxes look very nice.
The table on so
> On 27 Jun 2019, at 17:53, Mark Tinka wrote:
>
> On 27/Jun/19 17:49, Łukasz Bromirski wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Putting my Cisco hat for a moment:
>>
>> There are currently no such plans, but the natural current replacement
>> would
>> be NCS 540 (IOS-XR box) and NCS 560 (XR box as well, more alike
On 27/Jun/19 17:49, Łukasz Bromirski wrote:
>
>
> Putting my Cisco hat for a moment:
>
> There are currently no such plans, but the natural current replacement
> would
> be NCS 540 (IOS-XR box) and NCS 560 (XR box as well, more alike
> ASR 903/907 if you need modularity).
I don't know why for a
> On 27 Jun 2019, at 10:15, Mark Tinka wrote:
>
> On 27/Jun/19 01:46, Laurent Dumont wrote:
>> Overall, it looks like specific IOS versions are being eol-ed.
>
> That is common, and expected.
>
>> Has anyone seen any indication that the hardware platform itself would
>> be phased out?
>
> No
On 27/Jun/19 01:46, Laurent Dumont wrote:
> Overall, it looks like specific IOS versions are being eol-ed.
That is common, and expected.
> Has anyone seen any indication that the hardware platform itself would
> be phased out?
Nope.
Mark.
___
cisco
Jason,
It was an internally raised bug, so you probably won't find any mention of it
anywhere on any release notes. Classic case of the "fix it before someone
notices" :
CSCvb80108 - "On disposition VPLS traffic getting dropped and disposition label
info is not present on hw"
Fixed code rele
Can you share the details of the VPLS bug? BugID?
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jun 26, 2019, at 8:15 PM, Patrick Cole wrote:
>
> Laurent,
>
> The HW platform isn't, but the older SW (3.16/3.18) are EOL'd, I was advised
> by the TAC.
>
> With good reason too - We hit a bad VPLS bug in them tha
Thank you, yes its only code, not the hw.
On Wed, Jun 26, 2019, 20:15 Patrick Cole wrote:
> Laurent,
>
> The HW platform isn't, but the older SW (3.16/3.18) are EOL'd, I was
> advised by the TAC.
>
> With good reason too - We hit a bad VPLS bug in them that was fixed only
> in everest and beyon
Laurent,
The HW platform isn't, but the older SW (3.16/3.18) are EOL'd, I was advised by
the TAC.
With good reason too - We hit a bad VPLS bug in them that was fixed only in
everest and beyond
with no plans to backport. As such our fleet are now running 16.6 and we've
been good on that.
Pa
Overall, it looks like specific IOS versions are being eol-ed. Has anyone
seen any indication that the hardware platform itself would be phased out?
On Wed, Jun 26, 2019, 7:10 PM Mark Tinka wrote:
>
>
> On 27/Jun/19 00:33, Shawn L wrote:
> > I haven’t seen a roadmap where the hardware has been d
On 27/Jun/19 00:33, Shawn L wrote:
> I haven’t seen a roadmap where the hardware has been discontinued. Just
> put in a grant application to use a bunch of the new 12x 10 gig models and
> none of our research nor talking to Cisco directly showed any EOL any time
> soon
The ASR920 is still prese
I haven’t seen a roadmap where the hardware has been discontinued. Just
put in a grant application to use a bunch of the new 12x 10 gig models and
none of our research nor talking to Cisco directly showed any EOL any time
soon
On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 6:17 PM Igor Sukhomlinov
wrote:
> NCS5xx mi
NCS5xx might be an option for you.
Had a look on these guys in the lab recently - not so bad.
Some minor issues with the SW still exist since it is a new platform, but I
would buy that thing if the budget allows.
Rgds,
Igor
чт, 27 июн. 2019 г., 6:19 Mark Tinka :
>
>
> On 26/Jun/19 15:58, Muhamma
On 26/Jun/19 15:58, Muhammad Asif Rao wrote:
> Hi,
> Going through ASR 920 and look like EOL announced already. What is the best
> replacement capable of handling 10g aggregation. So far this been best
> option for considering value for $$ spent.
MX204.
Mark.
__
ao
> Sent: mercoledì 26 giugno 2019 17:42
> To: Gert Doering
> Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ASR 920 Replacement
>
> We are using features like BGP, EIGRP, ACLs and net flow.
>
> Routes are 2k and ACL is about max 500 entries.
>
> On Wed, Jun 26, 20
Also we using 4x10g ports.
On Wed, Jun 26, 2019, 11:41 Muhammad Asif Rao wrote:
> We are using features like BGP, EIGRP, ACLs and net flow.
>
> Routes are 2k and ACL is about max 500 entries.
>
> On Wed, Jun 26, 2019, 10:08 Gert Doering wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 09:58:14AM -
We are using features like BGP, EIGRP, ACLs and net flow.
Routes are 2k and ACL is about max 500 entries.
On Wed, Jun 26, 2019, 10:08 Gert Doering wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 09:58:14AM -0400, Muhammad Asif Rao wrote:
> > Going through ASR 920 and look like EOL announced already. W
--- Begin Message ---
the NCS line seems to be the next hardware evolution of the ASR900/920 line,
with models that correlate to just about everything in the 900 portfolio, as
well as next gen devices like the 540 that offer a lot more 10Gb+ density.
seems a lot like what they are doing with the
Hi,
Haven't looked at prices yet but, IIRC , the product Cisco is pushing as a
replacement is the ncs 540 .
On 26 Jun 2019 16:58, Muhammad Asif Rao wrote:
Hi,
Going through ASR 920 and look like EOL announced already. What is the best
replacement capable of handling 10g aggregation. So far thi
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 09:58:14AM -0400, Muhammad Asif Rao wrote:
> Going through ASR 920 and look like EOL announced already. What is the best
> replacement capable of handling 10g aggregation. So far this been best
> option for considering value for $$ spent.
What is it that you want to do
Hello,
On Wed, 26 Jun 2019 at 15:59, Muhammad Asif Rao wrote:
>
> Hi,
> Going through ASR 920 and look like EOL announced already.
I don't see any EOL announcement for the ASR920 (other then software).
Can you clarify what you mean and link to that EOL announcement please?
cheers,
lukas
Hi,
Going through ASR 920 and look like EOL announced already. What is the best
replacement capable of handling 10g aggregation. So far this been best
option for considering value for $$ spent.
Regards,
Asif
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.net
37 matches
Mail list logo
