Rinse,
BGP, OSPF and per use MQOS.
On 2/12/08 6:16 PM, "Rinse Kloek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Looks like every thousand user uses 1% CPU. What kind of features did you
> enable (BGP/OSP/ACL's ? )
>
>
> Roddy Strachan schreef:
>>
>> Actually testing/implementing one now.
>>
>> One tes
Looks like every thousand user uses 1% CPU. What kind of features did
you enable (BGP/OSP/ACL's ? )
Roddy Strachan schreef:
Actually testing/implementing one now.
One test we had about 12-13000 sessions on it, CPU was about 12%
That was a rough figure...
On 30/11/08 9:00 PM, "MKS" <[EMAIL
Hi,
We had a 1006 with ESP10G from Cisco.
1000 sessions, 90k pps, 800M, 1-2% CPU.
Tom
Roddy Strachan írta:
> Actually testing/implementing one now.
>
> One test we had about 12-13000 sessions on it, CPU was about 12%
>
> That was a rough figure...
>
>
>
> On 30/11/08 9:00 PM, "MKS" <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roddy Strachan
Sent: Sunday, November 30, 2008 6:23 AM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ASR terminating PPPoE
Actually testing/implementing one now.
One test we had about 12-13000 sessions on it, CPU was about 12%
That was a
Actually testing/implementing one now.
One test we had about 12-13000 sessions on it, CPU was about 12%
That was a rough figure...
On 30/11/08 9:00 PM, "MKS" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
>
> Has anyone any experience using the ASR 100x as a bras, terminating pppoe.
> Some traffic/sessions
Hi
Has anyone any experience using the ASR 100x as a bras, terminating pppoe.
Some traffic/sessions vs CPU load info would be great (on or off list)
Cisco clams up to 32.000 session, does that hold?
Regards
MKS
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck
