Hi,
On Wed, 1 Feb 2012, Christophe Fillot wrote:
Antonio Soares wrote:
Strange, I'm running 3.4.2S. Can you try after adding the "service
internal"
into the global configuration ?
I already had it in the config. Same message if I remove it.
I'm using 3.4.0aS: asr1001-universalk9.03.04.00a.S
On Wednesday, February 01, 2012 09:29:16 PM Christian
Kratzer wrote:
> this is explicitly without any software redundancy and
> the IOS still only sees 1G of the potential 2G it should
> bee seeing.
I can't tell you about the ASR1001. I've only seen this on
the ASR1002 and above, as well as all
Antonio Soares wrote:
Here's how to do it (asr1004):
conf t
platform shell
end
request platform software system shell rp active
Then you have Linux :)
Unfortunately not on the latest IOS-XE releases:
ASR_x#request platform software system shell rp active
Activity within this shell ca
Antonio Soares wrote:
Strange, I'm running 3.4.2S. Can you try after adding the "service internal"
into the global configuration ?
I already had it in the config. Same message if I remove it.
I'm using 3.4.0aS: asr1001-universalk9.03.04.00a.S.151-3.S0a.bin
Maybe newer releases don't have th
Sent: quarta-feira, 1 de Fevereiro de 2012 15:58
To: Antonio Soares
Cc: 'Christian Kratzer'; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ASR1000 - Software Redundancy
Antonio Soares wrote:
> Here's how to do it (asr1004):
>
> conf t
> platform shell
> end
>
Hi,
On Wed, 1 Feb 2012, Christophe Fillot wrote:
Antonio Soares wrote:
Here's how to do it (asr1004):
conf t
platform shell
end
request platform software system shell rp active
Then you have Linux :)
Unfortunately not on the latest IOS-XE releases:
ASR_x#request platform software sy
[mailto:c...@cksoft.de]
Sent: quarta-feira, 1 de Fevereiro de 2012 14:08
To: Antonio Soares
Cc: mti...@globaltransit.net; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [c-nsp] ASR1000 - Software Redundancy
Hi,
On Wed, 1 Feb 2012, Antonio Soares wrote:
> Can you open a shell and do a top so we can se
3:29
To: Antonio Soares
Cc: mti...@globaltransit.net; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ASR1000 - Software Redundancy
Hi,
On Wed, 1 Feb 2012, Antonio Soares wrote:
> Yes, lesson learned, no software redundancy at least with the RP1 which
> memory maximum is 4GB which means 70
Hi,
On Wed, 1 Feb 2012, Antonio Soares wrote:
Yes, lesson learned, no software redundancy at least with the RP1 which
memory maximum is 4GB which means 700MB usable...
In the meanwhile, I saw that it's possible to switch to the underlying OS
and we can do linux commands like top:
top - 03:50:
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 12:16:48PM -, Antonio Soares wrote:
> With Software Redundancy active, we still have almost 2GB free:
Can't give all the memory to these greedy IOSd processes!
gert,
still hoping to see something resembling *real* modularity show up
--
USENET is *not* the non-
'mti...@globaltransit.net'; 'cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net'
Subject: RE: [c-nsp] ASR1000 - Software Redundancy
Yes, lesson learned, no software redundancy at least with the RP1 which
memory maximum is 4GB which means 700MB usable...
In the meanwhile, I saw that it's possible to switc
ira, 1 de Fevereiro de 2012 02:04
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Cc: Antonio Soares
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ASR1000 - Software Redundancy
On Tuesday, January 31, 2012 11:38:53 PM Antonio Soares
wrote:
> The box has 4 GB of memory but the IOSd only allocates
> 1,7 GB. Is this dynamic ? How do we con
On Wednesday, February 01, 2012 05:11:51 PM Nikolay Shopik
wrote:
> 2Gb for internal purpose, it just over-top IMO. I can't
> think out anything what can use that 2Gb of memory on
> router, just for internal purposes.
I couldn't agree more. But I guess that's why IOS is closed
source :-).
Mark
2Gb for internal purpose, it just over-top IMO. I can't think out
anything what can use that 2Gb of memory on router, just for internal
purposes.
On 01/02/12 06:04, Mark Tinka wrote:
If you have 4GB DRAM in the router, IOSd itself will take
2GB and the other 2GB will be used for internal purpo
On Tuesday, January 31, 2012 11:38:53 PM Antonio Soares
wrote:
> The box has 4 GB of memory but the IOSd only allocates
> 1,7 GB. Is this dynamic ? How do we control this ?
We turned on software redundancy on our ASR1002's a couple
of years back, while they were running at least 3x full BGP
fe
'
Subject: RE: [c-nsp] ASR1000 - Software Redundancy
Ok, I received some off-list pointers and we enable Software Redundancy
enabling sso:
ASR1(config)#redundancy
ASR1(config-red)#mode ?
none no redundancy
rpr Route Processor Redundancy
sso Stateful Switchover
ASR1(config-red)#
---
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Antonio Soares
Sent: terça-feira, 31 de Janeiro de 2012 15:39
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] ASR1000 - Software Redundancy
Hello group,
I'm trying to find a document that explains how
Hello group,
I'm trying to find a document that explains how to configure/control the new
feature called Software Redundancy. I understand that boxes like the 1004
can have two IOS deamons running but I can't find anywhere how this really
works.
And do we have any type of control on the amount of
18 matches
Mail list logo
