On 8/Mar/20 15:34, james list wrote:
> If you see the output provided we run one ebgp (full routing) and then we
> have three ibpg (full routing).
> We need to add one egbp due to high bandwidth needed and since we want to
> use ibgp only in case of wan faults.
It would be good to track how
Mark, Saku,
Thanks for your help.
If you see the output provided we run one ebgp (full routing) and then we
have three ibpg (full routing).
We need to add one egbp due to high bandwidth needed and since we want to
use ibgp only in case of wan faults.
Can I run bgp multipath only on ebgp session?
On 8/Mar/20 12:11, Saku Ytti wrote:
>
> Cisco won't ECMP with different peer-as by default even with multipath
> enabled, you'll also need hidden command 'bgp bestpath as-path
> multipath-relax'.
That's why I don't mess around with some of these things :-).
Mark.
On Sun, 8 Mar 2020 at 12:04, Mark Tinka wrote:
> BGP always chooses one best path. So if both of your upstreams announce
> the same path, only one of them will be used. You can use features like
> BGP Multipath to load balance egress traffic over the two upstreams, but
> this isn't the default
On 8/Mar/20 09:48, james list wrote:
> We'd like to add a new EBGP peering on the same router (with full routing
> received from a second carrier) in order to load balance traffic (mainly in
> output).
> The question is: do you see any issue in terms of
> performance/memory/whatelse in adding
Dear all
I'd like to have your recommandation.
Our customer runs on ASR1001X an EBGP peering (full routing) with one ISP
and some internal IBGP peering (full routing) with other sites of the
customer.
ASR1001xxx#sh ip bgp summary
BGP router identifier 185.x.xxx, local AS number 12111
BGP table
