Re: [c-nsp] ASR1K software trains

2014-03-13 Thread Lukas Tribus
Hi, > Dang, I was kind of in the neighborhood. At a URL I can no longer dig > up, I saw that 3.7S was to be supported for a very, very long time, so > I thought I'd found a good candidate there. Generic support times for pre-3.10S releases are documented here [1], thats probably what you meant.

Re: [c-nsp] ASR1K software trains

2014-03-12 Thread Charles Sprickman
On Mar 8, 2014, at 3:26 AM, Lukas Tribus wrote: > Hi, > > >> In the world of IOS-XE, is there an equivalent to the old "S" train >> for service provider use? > > In IOS-XE there is no distinction such as S/M/T or GD. > > What you do have in IOS-XE is Extended-Support releases and Standard-Supp

Re: [c-nsp] ASR1K software trains

2014-03-08 Thread Lukas Tribus
Hi, > In the world of IOS-XE, is there an equivalent to the old "S" train > for service provider use? In IOS-XE there is no distinction such as S/M/T or GD. What you do have in IOS-XE is Extended-Support releases and Standard-Support releases [1]. For new deployments I would recommend the lates

[c-nsp] ASR1K software trains

2014-03-07 Thread Charles Sprickman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 So let me date myself hereā€¦ I started with IOS 10.3, mostly liked the 11.x GD train, loved the early 12.x "S" train of IOS. Since maybe 12.3, I'm really out of the loop on how to best avoid bleeding-edge bugs and feature-creep in IOS. So here sits