I'm wondering if cgn nat44 supports adding an additional subnet to an
existing cgn nat44 service.
in my test lab, i added an additional subnet to my cgn nat44 service (call
it subnet B) and i did not see the additional addresses show up in the
..."sh cgn nat44 nat1 statis"
then, worse, when i rem
Apparently, /27 is the smallest ip block you can use for cgnat pool (ASR9006
XR 5.3.1)
service cgn cgn1
service-type nat44 nat1
inside-vrf six
map outside-vrf one address-pool 193.193.193.0/32
when committing the above config, i get
!!% 'cgn' detected the 'warning' condition 'Pref
: Re: [c-nsp] ASR9006 - CG NAT - VSM-500
Just a wild guess here, but I suspect you might be seeing the source port on
your public IP, not the destination port in the CLI (despite the fact it calls
it 'destination port').
kind regards
Pshem
On Thu, 17 Dec 2015 at 04:23 Aa
Just a wild guess here, but I suspect you might be seeing the source port
on your public IP, not the destination port in the CLI (despite the fact it
calls it 'destination port').
kind regards
Pshem
On Thu, 17 Dec 2015 at 04:23 Aaron wrote:
> Syslogging for CGNat is turning up some interesting
Syslogging for CGNat is turning up some interesting destination port
numbers...I haven't been able to figure out the correlation. Please let me
know if you understand how to convert what IOS XR shows, and what syslog
shows... it seems that syslog is accurate and IOS XR is formatting the number
From: Pshem Kowalczyk [mailto:pshe...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, November 06, 2015 3:18 PM
To: Aaron; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net; Aftab Siddiqui; quinn snyder
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ASR9006 - CG NAT - VSM-500
Hi,
We use them inside our PEs (so it's MPLS in, MPLS out). The
t;
>
> -Original Message-
> From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
> Aaron
> Sent: Thursday, November 05, 2015 9:28 PM
> To: 'Pshem Kowalczyk'; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net; 'Aftab Siddiqui'
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ASR9006 -
o:pshe...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 05, 2015 7:58 PM
To: Aaron; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ASR9006 - CG NAT - VSM-500
Hi,
We use the previous non-virtualised cards (ISM-100) in our 9Ks. The experience
has been generally positive. The configuration is quite simple and
, November 05, 2015 7:58 PM
To: Aaron; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ASR9006 - CG NAT - VSM-500
Hi,
We use the previous non-virtualised cards (ISM-100) in our 9Ks. The experience
has been generally positive. The configuration is quite simple and the cards
work well.
Do spend some
Hi,
We use the previous non-virtualised cards (ISM-100) in our 9Ks. The
experience has been generally positive. The configuration is quite simple
and the cards work well.
Do spend some time analysing various limitations of the card (pool sizes,
throughput per ServiceApp pair, allowed bulk allocati
Hi Group,
I'm going to test Nat on my ASR9006 in my lab using the RSP440-TR and the
VSM-500.
Looking for any links to information or experience you all might have on how
to get going on this.
I'm looking for this to be implemented at my internet boundary ASR9k so I
will test it like tha
11 matches
Mail list logo
