On 6/2/2011 9:36 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> have others observed unicast flooding in topologies
>> without asymmetric traffic flows but with mismatched ARP/CAM timers?
> I've seen them with default timers. I don't know if they were
> mismatched.
>
> There is a feature called unknown unicast floo
> have others observed unicast flooding in topologies
> without asymmetric traffic flows but with mismatched ARP/CAM timers?
I've seen them with default timers. I don't know if they were
mismatched.
There is a feature called unknown unicast flood blocking (UUFB). It
might be available for your
On 6/2/11, geo...@dalyshome.co.uk wrote:
> I'm trying to establish consensus on best practice CAM and ARP aging
> timers for Cat6500 12.2(33)SXI5.
> Various cisco docs state these should be synched to minimise unknown
> unicast flooding. I'm looking into modifying them from the default
> values
I'm trying to establish consensus on best practice CAM and ARP aging
timers for Cat6500 12.2(33)SXI5.
Various cisco docs state these should be synched to minimise unknown
unicast flooding. I'm looking into modifying them from the default
values (ARP timer 14400 sec, MAC aging time 300 sec) to mi
