Re: [c-nsp] Bonded T3 Bandwidth issue

2011-03-05 Thread Jason Charlton
The Anda equipment is used to bond TDM / SONET based circuits (DS1 / DS3 / OC3) and provide an Ethernet circuit across. The provider he is using would have an Anda 2200 on their side, and one at his end. (That is both ends of the bonding) His hand-off from the Anda would be RJ45 ethernet,

Re: [c-nsp] Bonded T3 Bandwidth issue

2011-02-25 Thread Mark Kent
The anda is a metro E box. Are you bonding them and then turning the whole thing into ethernet? Also, how are they bonded? Are you running ml-ppp between the anda and the cisco? Doesn't it seem likely that the Anda box is the one doing the bonding? I see there is a 2212e model that has two

Re: [c-nsp] Bonded T3 Bandwidth issue

2011-02-25 Thread Lawrence
The 2212 DS3\E3 does the bonding and as you have stated the 7200 is out of the bonding role. Could this have anything to do with the negotiation between my fiber to copper converter and my router? This is what my wan provider is telling me. On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 09:02, Mark Kent

Re: [c-nsp] Bonded T3 Bandwidth issue

2011-02-25 Thread Keegan Holley
Doesn't it seem likely that the Anda box is the one doing the bonding? I see there is a 2212e model that has two DS3 wan interfaces. I would expect the fastE interface on this to be facing the cisco7200, which would take the cisco out of the bonding role. You can't have them bonded on one

Re: [c-nsp] Bonded T3 Bandwidth issue

2011-02-25 Thread Mark Kent
Just out of curiosity, why not use the ethernet ports on the 7200? That curiosity was the tip-off that the discussion here was going in a direction inconsistent with the set-up that Lawrence cisco-...@theindianmaiden.com has.Not that he has explained it fully yet, but it seems pretty clear

Re: [c-nsp] Bonded T3 Bandwidth issue

2011-02-25 Thread Keegan Holley
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 1:57 PM, Mark Kent m...@noc.mainstreet.net wrote: Just out of curiosity, why not use the ethernet ports on the 7200? That curiosity was the tip-off that the discussion here was going in a direction inconsistent with the set-up that Lawrence

Re: [c-nsp] Bonded T3 Bandwidth issue

2011-02-24 Thread Mikael Abrahamsson
On Thu, 24 Feb 2011, Stevan Zupanic wrote: Keep in mind the Windows TCP scaling limitations, with default window sizes an RTT of 10ms gives you a maximum of 52Mbps. TCP scaling is radically different between Windows versions, you can't really call it Windows TCP scaling limitation. XP is

Re: [c-nsp] Bonded T3 Bandwidth issue

2011-02-24 Thread Lawrence
Here is the further information that you have requested. I am using iperf unix client/server to test my speed. I have the same 45M limit if I try a bit torrent. I have a cisco 7200 router that is connected via a mvp copper to fiber converter. The t3s are bonded with an anda 2200. I have

Re: [c-nsp] Bonded T3 Bandwidth issue

2011-02-24 Thread Seth Mattinen
On 2/24/2011 10:02, Lawrence wrote: Here is the further information that you have requested. I am using iperf unix client/server to test my speed. I have the same 45M limit if I try a bit torrent. I have a cisco 7200 router that is connected via a mvp copper to fiber converter. The t3s are

Re: [c-nsp] Bonded T3 Bandwidth issue

2011-02-24 Thread Keegan Holley
The anda is a metro E box. Are you bonding them and then turning the whole thing into ethernet? Also, how are they bonded? Are you running ml-ppp between the anda and the cisco? On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 1:29 PM, Seth Mattinen se...@rollernet.us wrote: On 2/24/2011 10:02, Lawrence wrote: Here

Re: [c-nsp] Bonded T3 Bandwidth issue

2011-02-24 Thread Antonio Querubin
On Thu, 24 Feb 2011, Lawrence wrote: via a mvp copper to fiber converter. The t3s are bonded with an anda 2200. I have unbonded both t3s and they both get 45M over each circuit. How are they bonded? Are you using MLPPP? Are you using equal-cost routes? Are you using per-packet balancing?

[c-nsp] Bonded T3 Bandwidth issue

2011-02-23 Thread Lawrence
I have a bonded T3 that I have never been able to get over 45mbs. I have been on the phone with my ISP and they are able to verify that both circuits work and they feel bonded circuits are working fine and that any problem is on my side Does anybody know what could cause a bonded T3 not to be

Re: [c-nsp] Bonded T3 Bandwidth issue

2011-02-23 Thread John Neiberger
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 8:40 PM, Lawrence cisco-...@theindianmaiden.com wrote: I have a bonded T3 that I have never been able to get over 45mbs. I have been on the phone with my ISP and they are able to verify that both circuits work and they feel bonded  circuits are working fine and that any

Re: [c-nsp] Bonded T3 Bandwidth issue

2011-02-23 Thread Tim Pozar
How have you bonded the DS3? Typically load balancing on cisco boxes are per session so you will never get over anything beyond the speed of the link (45Mb/s). In order to do something beyond that, you need to load balance per packet. I wrote up this paper in '96 about how to do this with DS1s.

Re: [c-nsp] Bonded T3 Bandwidth issue

2011-02-23 Thread Stevan Zupanic
-nsp] Bonded T3 Bandwidth issue I have a bonded T3 that I have never been able to get over 45mbs. I have been on the phone with my ISP and they are able to verify that both circuits work and they feel bonded circuits are working fine and that any problem is on my side Does anybody know what could