t] On Behalf Of Azher
Mughal
Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2016 8:31 AM
To: Simon Lockhart
Cc: cisco-nsp
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] C6509 Fabric Switch Capacity
:) I agree, performance will vary for smaller packet sizes.
-Azher
On 1/13/2016 7:24 AM, Simon Lockhart wrote:
> On Wed Jan 13, 2016 at 07
hi,
On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 04:25:48PM +0200, Chris Knipe wrote:
> Whilst I can understand over subscription (and subsequent drops) on the
> WS-X6708, would the same hold true for the WS-X7604?
Yes, but for other reasons.
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
:) I agree, performance will vary for smaller packet sizes.
-Azher
On 1/13/2016 7:24 AM, Simon Lockhart wrote:
> On Wed Jan 13, 2016 at 07:10:09AM -0800, Azher Mughal wrote:
>> For WS 6704 (with DFC3B), I was able to go close to 9Gbps per port
>> across the bus when using Iperf and jumbo frames.
On Wed Jan 13, 2016 at 07:10:09AM -0800, Azher Mughal wrote:
> For WS 6704 (with DFC3B), I was able to go close to 9Gbps per port
> across the bus when using Iperf and jumbo frames. Single port on each of
> the bus gives you line rate of 9.9Gbps.
Sounds like you come from the Cisco camp of perform
For WS 6704 (with DFC3B), I was able to go close to 9Gbps per port
across the bus when using Iperf and jumbo frames. Single port on each of
the bus gives you line rate of 9.9Gbps.
-Azher
On 1/13/2016 7:01 AM, Adam Vitkovsky wrote:
>> Chris Knipe
>> Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2016 2:31 PM
>>
>>
> Chris Knipe
> Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2016 2:31 PM
>
> On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 4:28 PM, Simon Lockhart
> wrote:
>
> > On Wed Jan 13, 2016 at 04:25:48PM +0200, Chris Knipe wrote:
> > > Whilst I can understand over subscription (and subsequent drops) on
> > > the WS-X6708, would the same hol
for others.
Chuck
From: ckn...@savage.za.org [mailto:ckn...@savage.za.org] On Behalf Of Chris
Knipe
Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2016 9:26 AM
To: Chuck Church
Cc: Alireza Soltanian ; cisco-nsp
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] C6509 Fabric Switch Capacity
Hi,
Just wanted to chip in here
On Wed, 13 Jan 2016, Nick Hilliard wrote:
Alireza Soltanian wrote:
My questions are is What will happen if we exceed capacity(Egress or
Ingress) in Channel#0 of Slot#2? Will device use Capacity of Channel#1?
no - the traffic will be dropped.
slot 2 looks like a 6708 card. There's been a rea
On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 4:28 PM, Simon Lockhart wrote:
> On Wed Jan 13, 2016 at 04:25:48PM +0200, Chris Knipe wrote:
> > Whilst I can understand over subscription (and subsequent drops) on the
> > WS-X6708, would the same hold true for the WS-X7604?
>
> The WS-X6704 has woefully underpowered ASIC
On Wed Jan 13, 2016 at 04:25:48PM +0200, Chris Knipe wrote:
> Whilst I can understand over subscription (and subsequent drops) on the
> WS-X6708, would the same hold true for the WS-X7604?
The WS-X6704 has woefully underpowered ASICs on it. It has the dual 20G bus
connections, with two 10G ports o
> -Original Message-
> From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
> Alireza Soltanian
> Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2016 6:55 AM
> To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> Subject: [c-nsp] C6509 Fabric Switch Capacity
>
> Hi everybody
>
>
but I think
SXH should be ok.
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
Alireza Soltanian
Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2016 6:55 AM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] C6509 Fabric Switch Capacity
Hi everybody
We have C650
On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 11:11 PM, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> Alireza Soltanian wrote:
>> My questions are is What will happen if we exceed capacity(Egress or
>> Ingress) in Channel#0 of Slot#2? Will device use Capacity of Channel#1?
>
> no - the traffic will be dropped.
>
> slot 2 looks like a 6708 ca
Alireza Soltanian wrote:
> My questions are is What will happen if we exceed capacity(Egress or
> Ingress) in Channel#0 of Slot#2? Will device use Capacity of Channel#1?
no - the traffic will be dropped.
slot 2 looks like a 6708 card. There's been a reasonable amount of
discussion in the past on
Hi everybody
We have C6509-E with SUP720-3BXL. Based on what I understood from Cisco
Website, in this setup we can have 40Gbps in Fabric Switch between slots.
This Fabric Switch is divided into two 20Gbps channels.
Now in one our chassis we have this setup:
Mod Ports Card Type
15 matches
Mail list logo
