Further results - It looks like in our current configuration we can't get
past about 2.8Gb/s. We've reached that at about 600k PPS at about 97% of
CPU usage as reported by ESX (might be partially caused our traffic mix -
residential broadband, with a skew towards gaming). In theory we should be
Hi,
We've changed the following settings:
1. Set Latency Sensitve to High (
http://www.vmware.com/files/pdf/techpaper/latency-sensitive-perf-vsphere55.pdf
)
2. ethernetX.coalescingScheme = disable (for all interfaces, but
management on the VM)
3. Pin down memory and CPU (we run a 4 vCPU setup
On 8/May/15 02:17, Robert Hass wrote:
Hi
Can you give some URL to recommended ESXi tweaking ?
Or just write some recommendations here. I'm happy to test CSR on my
configuration
but I also would like apply tweaking tips first.
The ESXi tweaking I recall doing was disabling power management
Hi
Can you give some URL to recommended ESXi tweaking ?
Or just write some recommendations here. I'm happy to test CSR on my
configuration
but I also would like apply tweaking tips first.
Rob
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 11:17 PM, Pshem Kowalczyk pshe...@gmail.com wrote:
We've just started to
Cisco UCS, B200M3 blade, VIC 1240, CPU Xeon, E5-2665, DDR1600.
kind regards
Pshem
what hardware are you running this on? i.e. cpu / ethernet cards.
Nick
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
On 06/05/2015 22:17, Pshem Kowalczyk wrote:
We've just started to evaluate the CSR1000V as a traffic-carrying router.
So far we've pushed about 2.2Gb/s through it with no problems. When it
comes to PPS - we're doing about 450k. The way the load shapes seems to
indicate that the box should be
How much should I expect to pay for a license capable of 1Gbps and a full
routing table? Ballpark.
Josh
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 5:17 PM, Pshem Kowalczyk pshe...@gmail.com wrote:
We've just started to evaluate the CSR1000V as a traffic-carrying router.
So far we've pushed about 2.2Gb/s through
On 6/May/15 23:17, Pshem Kowalczyk wrote:
We've just started to evaluate the CSR1000V as a traffic-carrying
router. So far we've pushed about 2.2Gb/s through it with no problems.
When it comes to PPS - we're doing about 450k. The way the load shapes
seems to indicate that the box should be
We've just started to evaluate the CSR1000V as a traffic-carrying router.
So far we've pushed about 2.2Gb/s through it with no problems. When it
comes to PPS - we're doing about 450k. The way the load shapes seems to
indicate that the box should be able to handle about 5Gb/s using the APPX
On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 3:37 AM, Mark Tinka mark.ti...@seacom.mu wrote:
That's right.
Mark.
___
Can the CSR1000v handle a full routing table(s)? Any limitations that I
should be aware of when handling a full table and ~1gbps of traffic?
On 5/May/15 14:41, Josh Baird wrote:
Can the CSR1000v handle a full routing table(s)? Any limitations that
I should be aware of when handling a full table and ~1gbps of traffic?
CSR1000v is 100% software, so you do not get FIB limitations.
You need the right license to unlock RIB slots,
On 5/May/15 11:39, Phil Mayers wrote:
Do you know what the latency is like on that?
You mean for traffic traversing/hitting the box?
Mark.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
On 5/May/15 14:52, Phil Mayers wrote:
Yes. I can't remember where, but I have the impression either the CSR
or vMX had oddly high forwarding latency, even accounting for the fact
it's just software.
Right - I can't recall whether it was on c-nsp or NANOG, but I think the
issue was that
On 05/05/15 13:29, Mark Tinka wrote:
On 5/May/15 11:39, Phil Mayers wrote:
Do you know what the latency is like on that?
You mean for traffic traversing/hitting the box?
Yes. I can't remember where, but I have the impression either the CSR or
vMX had oddly high forwarding latency, even
On 01/05/15 19:54, Mark Tinka wrote:
CSR1000v?
Do you know what the latency is like on that?
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at
On 2/May/15 13:08, Adam Vitkovsky wrote:
Interesting idea,
CSR1000v BW can go up to 10GE (license base upgrade) right?
That's right.
Mark.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
On 3/May/15 00:59, Anders Löwinger wrote:
Can it handle QoS in any way?
Yes.
Mark.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
On 30 April 2015 at 15:35, Dan Brisson dbris...@uvm.edu wrote:
Looking for suggestions for a device (switch/router) that can speak BGP and
do around 20k prefixes. The other requirement is minimum 500Mb/s of
throughput, which seems to throw a low-end Cisco router out of the mix. I
know a 3560
Mark Tinka
Sent: 01 May 2015 19:55
To: Dan Brisson; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Cheap BGP router for ~20k prefixes
On 30/Apr/15 16:35, Dan Brisson wrote:
Looking for suggestions for a device (switch/router) that can speak
BGP and do around 20k prefixes. The other
On 2015-05-02 13:08, Adam Vitkovsky wrote:
Interesting idea,
CSR1000v BW can go up to 10GE (license base upgrade) right?
Can it handle QoS in any way?
/Anders
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Hi,
On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 02:35:03PM -0400, Dan Brisson wrote:
ASR920 or so... throughput will be fine, price of 2000$ should be
achievable (depending on interface and license options).
[..]
Thanks for the response, Gert. It looks like the 920 would work but I'm
seeing that it is already
Hi,
On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 02:45:36PM -0400, Dan Brisson wrote:
Ah, is this for the specific software version only and not for hardware?
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/routers/asr-920-series-aggregation-services-router/eos-eol-notice-c51-733935.html
Yep...
Customers are
On 30/Apr/15 16:35, Dan Brisson wrote:
Looking for suggestions for a device (switch/router) that can speak
BGP and do around 20k prefixes. The other requirement is minimum
500Mb/s of throughput, which seems to throw a low-end Cisco router out
of the mix. I know a 3560 switch can do BGP and
On 4/30/2015 10:53 AM, Gert Doering wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 10:35:49AM -0400, Dan Brisson wrote:
Looking for suggestions for a device (switch/router) that can speak BGP
and do around 20k prefixes. The other requirement is minimum 500Mb/s of
throughput, which seems to throw a
On 5/1/2015 2:43 PM, Gert Doering wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 02:35:03PM -0400, Dan Brisson wrote:
ASR920 or so... throughput will be fine, price of 2000$ should be
achievable (depending on interface and license options).
[..]
Thanks for the response, Gert. It looks like the 920
On 5/1/2015 2:48 PM, Gert Doering wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 02:45:36PM -0400, Dan Brisson wrote:
Ah, is this for the specific software version only and not for hardware?
Looking for suggestions for a device (switch/router) that can speak BGP
and do around 20k prefixes. The other requirement is minimum 500Mb/s of
throughput, which seems to throw a low-end Cisco router out of the mix.
I know a 3560 switch can do BGP and wouldn't have the throughput
limitations
^
% Invalid input detected at '^' marker.
Woops, wrong chassis :D
Cory
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Gert
Doering
Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2015 9:53 AM
To: Dan Brisson
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Cheap BGP
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 10:35:49AM -0400, Dan Brisson wrote:
Looking for suggestions for a device (switch/router) that can speak BGP
and do around 20k prefixes. The other requirement is minimum 500Mb/s of
throughput, which seems to throw a low-end Cisco router out of the mix.
I know
Vyos - www.vyos.net
Chris
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 8:53 AM, Gert Doering g...@greenie.muc.de wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 10:35:49AM -0400, Dan Brisson wrote:
Looking for suggestions for a device (switch/router) that can speak BGP
and do around 20k prefixes. The other
30 matches
Mail list logo
