I'm about to scrap my 3750E for a 49xx. I have packet drops and buffer misses.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
We scrapped a bunch of 3560X after they suffered packetdrops on interfaces. Running 4948-E now and have been happy since. :)Gustav UhlanderCommunication & Infrastructure EngineerSteria ABKungsbron 13Box 169SE-101 23 StockholmSwedenTel: +46 8 622 42 15Fax: +46 8 622 42 23Mobile: +46 70 962 71 03gus
On Thu, 2012-12-13 at 13:15 +, Gordon Bryan wrote:
> I have seen and read many a post on this list regarding microbursts
> and have always tried to err on the side of caution when choosing
> switches and usually go for models with meaty buffers and was
> considering for this deployment the 4948
Are you sure Gigabit is going to be sufficient for your needs?
We use Nexus 5ks in one location and 10gig blades for a 4600 chassis in
another, both of which work fairly well. The Nexus isn't without its share
of problems, but overall, they've been stable and have performed well.
We're also usin
c-nsp] Choosing Switches to Support VM Clusters
We're about to deploy 3750X ... As per Dell, whose SANs we are
deploying, this switch has been tested and is considered up to snuff by
them.
Real world experience ... none yet.
On 12/13/2012 8:15 AM, Gordon Bryan wrote:
> Hi List,
>
&
We're about to deploy 3750X ... As per Dell, whose SANs we are
deploying, this switch has been tested and is considered up to snuff by
them.
Real world experience ... none yet.
On 12/13/2012 8:15 AM, Gordon Bryan wrote:
Hi List,
I'm involved in building a small split-site data centre, with t
Hi List,
I'm involved in building a small split-site data centre, with the main focus on
hosting primary/backup VM Clusters.
I have seen and read many a post on this list regarding microbursts and have
always tried to err on the side of caution when choosing switches and usually
go for models
