> Mark Tinka
> Sent: Friday, January 10, 2020 11:38 AM
>
> However, if the limitations in Broadcom chips apply to
> all vendors that use them, no amount of software hackery will fix that. So if
> both Arista and Cisco are struggling to deliver the same features due to a
> limitation in the
On 10/Jan/20 16:57, Tom Hill wrote:
> To some extent, I would agree. Though I do not agree entirely.
>
> At a certain level of "one size fits all", you reach a point where no,
> actually that box isn't suitable for every function. Either it's
> designed for a different use-case, or the bill of
On 10/Jan/20 16:52, Brian Turnbow wrote:
> You neglected to mention that they also mostly provide feature parity across
> the platforms that use that silicon
> So box a and box b will do the sames things in the same way, with the same
> commands.
> So no we at business unit service provider
On 09/01/2020 18:19, Gert Doering wrote:
> Cisco has a zillion products that mainly differenciate in "which of
> the advertised features are unusable or broken" and "what operating
> system do we use this week?".
>
> Ditching out half the products and using the engineering capacity
> freed by
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,
> Broadcom levels the playing field amongst traditional and new vendors.
> If Cisco and Juniper have the same access to Broadcom chips as do newer
> market entrants such as Arista and Arrcus, what are we really paying the
> traditional, expensive vendors for when
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,
>
> I do have *null* understanding for "we have cisco proprietary protocols that
> our customers are actively using (HSRP, EIGRP) but we do not support this on
> because we can, buy something else!" (EIGRP on IOS XR
> on NCS5k, HSRPv2 with IPv6 on ASR920).
>
On 10/Jan/20 13:09, Sigurbjörn Birkir Lárusson wrote:
>
>
> Additionally The NCS line, both the DC and SP products, are based on Broadcom
> chipsets which are heavily limited in their capabilities, particularly egress
> TCAM capabilities are limited in such a way that it makes it almost
On 9/Jan/20 20:19, Gert Doering wrote:
>> Cisco has a zillion products that mainly differenciate in "which of
>> the advertised features are unusable or broken" and "what operating
>> system do we use this week?".
>>
>> Ditching out half the products and using the
On 9/Jan/20 20:19, Gert Doering wrote:
> Cisco has a zillion products that mainly differenciate in "which of
> the advertised features are unusable or broken" and "what operating
> system do we use this week?".
>
> Ditching out half the products and using the engineering capacity
> freed by
Hi,
On Thu, Jan 09, 2020 at 07:01:32PM +0100, Ted Pelas Johansson wrote:
> So you are saying that a vendor shouldn't have certain products for certain
> domains? I'm unsure what your reasons is to be honest.
Cisco has a zillion products that mainly differenciate in "which of
the advertised
So you are saying that a vendor shouldn't have certain products for certain
domains? I'm unsure what your reasons is to be honest.
Best Regards,
Ted Pelas Johansson
On 9 Jan 2020, 18:30 +0100, Gert Doering , wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Jan 09, 2020 at 04:34:53PM +, Tom Hill wrote:
> > On
Hi,
On Thu, Jan 09, 2020 at 04:34:53PM +, Tom Hill wrote:
> On 09/01/2020 15:56, Adrian Minta wrote:
> > Nexus 9000 is more suitable for this task. Even the price is much lower.
>
> This. Stick with the data centre products for data centre tasks.
>
> If you need NCS for some other reason as
On 09/01/2020 15:56, Adrian Minta wrote:
> Nexus 9000 is more suitable for this task. Even the price is much lower.
This. Stick with the data centre products for data centre tasks.
If you need NCS for some other reason as well, that's fine, but start
with the suitable product range as Adrian
Hello,
Nexus 9000 is more suitable for this task. Even the price is much lower.
On 1/8/20 6:53 PM, Alex K. wrote:
Hello everyone,
A customer of mine's interested in acquiring some NCS boxes, in order to
aggregate all their servers with few NCSes as possible and p2p connect
between them
On Wed, 2020-01-08 at 18:53 +0200, Alex K. wrote:
> A customer of mine's interested in acquiring some NCS boxes, in order
> to aggregate all their servers with few NCSes as possible and p2p
> connect between them (actually between few small DCs), using VxLAN.
I can't seem to find anything on NCS
Hello everyone,
A customer of mine's interested in acquiring some NCS boxes, in order to
aggregate all their servers with few NCSes as possible and p2p connect
between them (actually between few small DCs), using VxLAN.
On paper it looks good. NCS seems to offer good port density, reasonable
16 matches
Mail list logo
