you have a couple options.
option one, you can use the browser proxy via GPO or what ever, but this
limit's you to a single Tower (it's still a cluster setup, but if that DC
goes down, your still up a creek).
option two is that you install the Cisco Anyconnect Client (Web security
part, there is
Aha, so the client determines that "hey, you need to authenticate to this
portal first" and then is business as usual. This makes complete sense.
>From the discussion I was under the impression that there is no client
installed on the machine and you push browser proxy settings through GPO
and tha
Accept the terms of the captive portal, then all your connections go to
CCWS after that. The anyconnect client is smart enough to not push the
traffic until it has a internet connection. I guess unless you put it into
a closed state. we have it open so that when they are out of the office
they c
Helllo Pui,
Thanks for the pointers but I think you misunderstood my question. I know
how to set up a captive portal for WiFi access.
What I wanted to know is how are users logging into captive portals when
the browser has a proxy set and it tries to send all requests to the proxy
server which un
Hi,
How do you handle captive portals in hotels and other venues where you
first have to login into the portal and then have Internet access ?
This is my biggest woe right now in this regards with any kind of proxy
settings I can push to users.
Thanks,
Eugeniu
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 10:05 PM,
We currently use CCWS (previously ScanSafe) with the Anyconnect client.
Nice solution. Whether your in the office or remoting from a Starbucks,
the traffic is always proxied. We went with the solution because of a
couple reasons:
1. with multiple egress points on the corporate network, we didn'
First of all, why are you allowing or disallowing split tunnel networks ?
There is always the risk that he/she may get infected with some malware
that your antivirus does not recognize and it spreads through the internet
network when the user VPNs to the corporate network.
From what I've seen,
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 6:18 PM, Eugeniu Patrascu wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 5:53 PM, Herro91 wrote:
>
> > Has anyone on the lists explored Cisco's ScanSafe SaaS offering, now
> called
> > Cisco Cloud Web Security - as a means of providing protection in the
> cloud
> > that would potentially
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 5:53 PM, Herro91 wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm doing some research on the Cisco Cloud Web Security offering, also
> known as ScanSafe.
>
> Has anyone on the lists explored Cisco's ScanSafe SaaS offering, now called
> Cisco Cloud Web Security - as a means of providing protection in t
Hi,
I'm doing some research on the Cisco Cloud Web Security offering, also
known as ScanSafe.
Has anyone on the lists explored Cisco's ScanSafe SaaS offering, now called
Cisco Cloud Web Security - as a means of providing protection in the cloud
that would potentially negate the requirement to hav
10 matches
Mail list logo
