Re: [c-nsp] Cisco life cycle strategy

2020-11-21 Thread Seth Mattinen
On 11/20/20 07:06, aar...@gvtc.com wrote: I don't know if I fully understand why a vendor EOL's a piece of equipment or software version. There are probably various reasons why a vendor chooses to do this. I feel as the customer that just because a vendor thinks something is EOL, doesn't mean

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco life cycle strategy

2020-11-20 Thread aaron1
of the intent of this thread :) -Aaron -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp On Behalf Of harbor235 Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2020 2:19 PM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] Cisco life cycle strategy Hello, What is your replacement strategy for Cisco gear reaching EOL milestones

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco life cycle strategy

2020-11-20 Thread James Bensley
On Thu, 19 Nov 2020 at 20:23, harbor235 wrote: > > Hello, > > What is your replacement strategy for Cisco gear reaching EOL milestones? > > I prefer not to replace at the end of SW maintenance releases but prefer > the end of vulnerability/Security support. My assumption is by then all the >

[c-nsp] Cisco life cycle strategy

2020-11-19 Thread harbor235
Hello, What is your replacement strategy for Cisco gear reaching EOL milestones? I prefer not to replace at the end of SW maintenance releases but prefer the end of vulnerability/Security support. My assumption is by then all the major bugs and fixes should be remedied/ fixed by then and the