On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 09:19:03AM -0400, Drew Weaver wrote:
No to thread Hijack, but how do you guys handle injecting /32s for
null/blackhole into your upstream providers?
Using a tag on the static route? with a route-map that matches the tag? which
then adds a community?
thanks,
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 09:19:03AM -0400, Drew Weaver wrote:
No to thread Hijack, but how do you guys handle injecting /32s for
null/blackhole into your upstream providers?
Using a tag on the static route? with a route-map that matches the tag? which
then adds a community?
Add tag on
On Mon, 15 Mar 2010 17:01:07 -0400, you wrote:
router bgp asnr
address-family ipv4
aggregate-address A.A.A.A M.M.M.M attribute-map BGP-LOCAL
route-map BGP-LOCAL permit 10
set metric 10
set local-preference 1000
set origin igp
set community whatever
Indeed. That not
On 3/16/2010 9:19 AM, Drew Weaver wrote:
No to thread Hijack, but how do you guys handle injecting /32s for
null/blackhole into your upstream providers?
Using a tag on the static route? with a route-map that matches the tag? which
then adds a community?
thanks,
-Drew
*If* your
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 01:08:03PM -0400, Jason Lixfeld wrote:
I've been in the habit of using communities to anchor and announce
prefixes into BGP for years and I think my ways are somewhat dated.
I'm looking for a bit of a refresh. Wondering if anyone here has
any thoughts ;)
[snip]
I've been in the habit of using communities to anchor and announce prefixes
into BGP for years and I think my ways are somewhat dated. I'm looking for a
bit of a refresh. Wondering if anyone here has any thoughts ;)
So hypothetically speaking:
!
router bgp 65535
no synchronization
neighbor
-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jason Lixfeld
Sent: Monday, March 15, 2010 10:08 AM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] Current BGP BCP for anchoring and announcing local
prefixes
I've been in the habit of using communities to anchor
On Mon, 15 Mar 2010 13:08:03 -0400, you wrote:
aggregate-address may be a reasonable solution, but I can't seem to
tag a community with an aggregate-address statement like I can with
a network statement
router bgp asnr
address-family ipv4
aggregate-address A.A.A.A M.M.M.M attribute-map
On 2010-03-15, at 4:37 PM, Asbjorn Hojmark - Lists wrote:
On Mon, 15 Mar 2010 13:08:03 -0400, you wrote:
aggregate-address may be a reasonable solution, but I can't seem to
tag a community with an aggregate-address statement like I can with
a network statement
router bgp asnr
