I understand that they use different frequency ranges, but why can't the DSL
freqencies be converted and sent over fiber somewhere between the CPE and
the DSLAM ?
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 11:41 PM, Dmitry Kiselev dmi...@dmitry.net wrote:
Hello!
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 08:48:27PM -0800, Yuri
On Fri, 11 Dec 2009, Yuri Bank wrote:
I understand that they use different frequency ranges, but why can't the DSL
freqencies be converted and sent over fiber somewhere between the CPE and
the DSLAM ?
Why would you want to run DSL when you have fiber?
--
Mikael Abrahamssonemail:
for the the mini-DSLAM.
Arie
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Yuri Bank
Sent: Friday, December 11, 2009 14:46
To: Yuri Bank; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] DSL signals vs DOCSIS
I understand
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 04:46:24AM -0800, Yuri Bank wrote:
I understand that they use different frequency ranges, but why can't the DSL
freqencies be converted and sent over fiber somewhere between the CPE and
the DSLAM ?
They could be. Do you think installing devices to do that at the point
Why can't DSL signals pass through fiber optics, yet we have HFC networks
that obviously have no issues going from copper to fiber.
The modulation techniques DOCSIS and DSL use are similar, so what prevents
this from working with DSL? Is it that the RF is to weak and the conversion
process messes
Hello!
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 08:48:27PM -0800, Yuri Bank wrote:
Why can't DSL signals pass through fiber optics, yet we have HFC networks
that obviously have no issues going from copper to fiber.
The modulation techniques DOCSIS and DSL use are similar, so what prevents
this from working
