Re: [c-nsp] DWDM Passive or Active Multiplexing

https://ripe67.ripe.net/presentations/131-ripe2-2.pdf Jared Mauch On Mar 11, 2016, at 5:32 AM, Lukas Tribus wrote: >> We are running dwdm with just splitters and amplifiers at 100 GE with no >> issues. > > You run multiple 100GE circuits over (semi) passive DWDM, how does

Re: [c-nsp] DWDM Passive or Active Multiplexing

> We are running dwdm with just splitters and amplifiers at 100 GE with no > issues. You run multiple 100GE circuits over (semi) passive DWDM, how does that work? Do you have 100GE DWDM transceivers on different DWDM wavelengths? Thanks, Lukas

Re: [c-nsp] DWDM Passive or Active Multiplexing

Thank you everyone for all the great information. Much appreciated!! I am having meeting with a couple other vendors onsite next-week and will review their solutions as well as the cost. Josh On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 5:47 AM, Phil Mayers wrote: > On 09/03/16 22:37,

Re: [c-nsp] DWDM Passive or Active Multiplexing

On 09/03/16 22:37, Jared Mauch wrote: If you are only doing 10g there are a lot of inexpensive solutions in this space for the distances you mentioned. Agreed. Cisco are not the vendor that would spring to mind for this. Lots of good, reliable, cheap passive DWDM muxes out there.

Re: [c-nsp] DWDM Passive or Active Multiplexing

> I can't speak to the roadmap or plans for that product, but the only > thing that is currently announced for EOL is the EWDM-OA amplifier. > There is no announced EOL for the 2/4/8 port units. I must have mixed that up with some other, unrelated EOL, sorry about that. But do talk to a vendor

Re: [c-nsp] DWDM Passive or Active Multiplexing

Hi, On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 10:55:51PM +0100, Lukas Tribus wrote: > I would suggest you talk to some other vendor as well, specifically a vendor > how cares about passive solutions. > > I may be wrong, but my impression is that Cisco is EOL'ing the entire > *passive* CWDM and DWDM gear. Whens

Re: [c-nsp] DWDM Passive or Active Multiplexing

We are running dwdm with just splitters and amplifiers at 100 GE with no issues. The most we have on at the end is currently 10 wavelengths. Aaron On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 7:04 PM, Jeremy Bresley wrote: > On 3/9/2016 6:45 PM, Josh Karki wrote: > >> Hmm...I haven't heard

Re: [c-nsp] DWDM Passive or Active Multiplexing

On 3/9/2016 6:45 PM, Josh Karki wrote: Hmm...I haven't heard that Cisco is Eol'ing the passive *WDM gears. This is odd. I will talk to our SE about it and can confirm. We purchased a couple of Mux8 and some OADM4 port CWDM devices about 2 and half years ago. Cisco Active solution with ONS is

Re: [c-nsp] DWDM Passive or Active Multiplexing

Hmm...I haven't heard that Cisco is Eol'ing the passive *WDM gears. This is odd. I will talk to our SE about it and can confirm. We purchased a couple of Mux8 and some OADM4 port CWDM devices about 2 and half years ago. Cisco Active solution with ONS is very expensive. I agree, I think we should

Re: [c-nsp] DWDM Passive or Active Multiplexing

If you are only doing 10g there are a lot of inexpensive solutions in this space for the distances you mentioned. Jared Mauch On Mar 9, 2016, at 4:55 PM, Lukas Tribus wrote: >> Hi Tim, thanks for your great info! Appreciate it. >> >> Hey Bill, thanks for your offline

Re: [c-nsp] DWDM Passive or Active Multiplexing

> Hi Tim, thanks for your great info! Appreciate it. > > Hey Bill, thanks for your offline email and confirming that the passive > DWDM should work in our environment. All great info!! > > Our ring is east and westbound within 30km and in between, we currently > have like 6 drops active and

Re: [c-nsp] DWDM Passive or Active Multiplexing

ARNet, or the > sender, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, > please contact the sender immediately and delete all copies of this > transmission. > > ____ > From: cisco-nsp [cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] on

Re: [c-nsp] DWDM Passive or Active Multiplexing

Sent: Wednesday, 9 March 2016 6:16 AM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] DWDM Passive or Active Multiplexing We are working with Cisco to replace our passive CWDM with DWDM ring network. The goal here is to upgrade 1G CWDM with 10G. The current CWDM ring with use of all (8) wavelengths wi

[c-nsp] DWDM Passive or Active Multiplexing

We are working with Cisco to replace our passive CWDM with DWDM ring network. The goal here is to upgrade 1G CWDM with 10G. The current CWDM ring with use of all (8) wavelengths within 30kms is working just fine. It's a passive solutions and I don's see any powering issues with it. When we