On 17/12/17 20:04, David Hubbard wrote:
> If NCS did vPC and let you put VRRP on any layer 3 interface, it would be
> awesome...
It would be an N7700 with full scale FIB, surely? ;)
(Just add a few zeroes to the price.)
--
Tom
___
cisco-nsp mailing l
Definitely feeling that right now. It also, I’ve learned, has no first hop
redundancy option that works on a BVI. VRRP only works on physical or EFP
interfaces (i.e. layer 3-specific sub interfaces), not BVI’s, so there’s no way
to handle both layer 2 and provide a redundant default gateway fo
On 16/12/17 02:01, David Hubbard wrote:
> Seems like a glaring omission in this platform to not have an active/active
> layer 2 option.
Remember: if they sold you one box that did everything, you'd buy fewer
boxes.
--
Tom
___
cisco-nsp mailing list c
>
>
> Brian
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf
> > Of David Hubbard
> > Sent: giovedì 14 dicembre 2017 18:07
> >
> > From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf
> > Of David Hubbard
> > Sent: giovedì 14 dicembre 2017 18:07
> > To: cisco-nsp
> > Subject: [c-nsp] Does NCS behave like Nexus w/regard to vPC+VRRP
> > active/active?
&
co-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
> Brian Turnbow
> Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2017 5:33 PM
> To: 'David Hubbard'; 'cisco-nsp'
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Does NCS behave like Nexus w/regard to vPC+VRRP
> active/active?
>
> Hi Dave
t; Subject: [c-nsp] Does NCS behave like Nexus w/regard to vPC+VRRP
> active/active?
>
> Hey all, before I go too far down the configuration path, was curious if
> anyone knows off hand if the NCS5500 line (5501SE with IOS XR 6.2.25)
> behave like Nexus when you set up vPC + VRRP where
Hey all, before I go too far down the configuration path, was curious if anyone
knows off hand if the NCS5500 line (5501SE with IOS XR 6.2.25) behave like
Nexus when you set up vPC + VRRP where data plane is active/active for
forwarding?
Thanks,
David
