Re: [c-nsp] EoMPLS between subinterface and physical interface

On (2009-08-17 20:03 +0300), Tassos Chatzithomaoglou wrote: > == > For a particular EoMPLS connection, both the ingress EoMPLS > interface on the ingress PE and the egress EoMPLS interface on the > egress PE have to be subinterfaces with dot1Q encapsulation or >

Re: [c-nsp] EoMPLS between subinterface and physical interface

-nsp Subject: Re: [c-nsp] EoMPLS between subinterface and physical interface Hi, On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 05:19:51PM +0200, Arie Vayner (avayner) wrote: > What I am not sure is whether the 7600 would even allow you to put an > access port on the same VLAN used on the sub-if. No quick way

Re: [c-nsp] EoMPLS between subinterface and physical interface

Hi, On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 05:19:51PM +0200, Arie Vayner (avayner) wrote: > What I am not sure is whether the 7600 would even allow you to put an > access port on the same VLAN used on the sub-if. No quick way for me to > test it right now. Not with SX* software - VLAN space is global, and a VLA

Re: [c-nsp] EoMPLS between subinterface and physical interface

> What I am not sure is whether the 7600 would even allow you to put an > access port on the same VLAN used on the sub-if. No quick way for me to > test it right now. I can answer that... It won't allow it. This solution with LAN line cards would require VLAN mapping, which isn't pretty, at all.

Re: [c-nsp] EoMPLS between subinterface and physical interface

ld be to use ES20/ES40 and EVCs. Arie -Original Message- From: Tassos Chatzithomaoglou [mailto:ach...@forthnet.gr] Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 12:19 To: Arie Vayner (avayner) Cc: cisco-nsp Subject: Re: [c-nsp] EoMPLS between subinterface and physical interface Arie, I'm actua

Re: [c-nsp] EoMPLS between subinterface and physical interface

On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 13:32, Marko Milivojevic wrote: > Have you tried to use native VLAN on 7600-1 for the subinterface? Mind > you, I'm not 100% sure if you can actually xconnect native VLAN, but > you may give it a go... Sorry, I meant to say on 7600-2. -- Marko CCIE #18427 (SP) My network b

Re: [c-nsp] EoMPLS between subinterface and physical interface

Have you tried to use native VLAN on 7600-1 for the subinterface? Mind you, I'm not 100% sure if you can actually xconnect native VLAN, but you may give it a go... -- Marko CCIE #18427 (SP) My network blog: http://cisco.markom.info/ On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 09:19, Tassos Chatzithomaoglou wrote: >

Re: [c-nsp] EoMPLS between subinterface and physical interface

y, August 17, 2009 20:04 To: cisco-nsp Subject: [c-nsp] EoMPLS between subinterface and physical interface I'm reading under EoMPLS Guidelines and Restrictions http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/routers/7600/ios/12.2SR/configuration/gu ide/pfc3mpls.html#wp1109041 ===

Re: [c-nsp] EoMPLS between subinterface and physical interface

Tasso, What are you trying to achieve? Arie -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Tassos Chatzithomaoglou Sent: Monday, August 17, 2009 20:04 To: cisco-nsp Subject: [c-nsp] EoMPLS between subinterface and

[c-nsp] EoMPLS between subinterface and physical interface

I'm reading under EoMPLS Guidelines and Restrictions http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/routers/7600/ios/12.2SR/configuration/guide/pfc3mpls.html#wp1109041 == For a particular EoMPLS connection, both the ingress EoMPLS interface on the ingress PE and the egress Eo