Re: [c-nsp] Experiences with l2tpv3/xconnect?

2009-11-06 Thread Rens
@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Experiences with l2tpv3/xconnect? Surely you mean 40mbps or a different platform? tv - Original Message - From: "Rens" To: "'Adrian Chadd'" ; Sent: Thursday, November 05, 2009 2:12 AM Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Experiences with l2tpv3/xc

Re: [c-nsp] Experiences with l2tpv3/xconnect?

2009-11-05 Thread Tony Varriale
Surely you mean 40mbps or a different platform? tv - Original Message - From: "Rens" To: "'Adrian Chadd'" ; Sent: Thursday, November 05, 2009 2:12 AM Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Experiences with l2tpv3/xconnect? I have already done up to 400 Mbps with 281

Re: [c-nsp] Experiences with l2tpv3/xconnect?

2009-11-05 Thread Adrian Chadd
On Thu, Nov 05, 2009, Rens wrote: > I have already done up to 400 Mbps with 2811 or 2821 (don't remember) > You just have to make sure your MTU is high enough depending on the frame > sizes you want to tunnel. Just out of morbid curiousity - so will the router terminating L2TPv3 actually fragment

Re: [c-nsp] Experiences with l2tpv3/xconnect?

2009-11-05 Thread Adrian Chadd
On Fri, Nov 06, 2009, Dale Shaw wrote: > > I don't have the option to up the MTU; the supplied underlying circuit > > is an L2 ethernet metro ethernet style service. > > Do you know for sure that the carrier MTU doesn't have the headroom you need? I'm going to make that assumption in case it is

Re: [c-nsp] Experiences with l2tpv3/xconnect?

2009-11-05 Thread Dale Shaw
Hi Adrian, On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 9:44 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote: > > I don't have the option to up the MTU; the supplied underlying circuit > is an L2 ethernet metro ethernet style service. Do you know for sure that the carrier MTU doesn't have the headroom you need? cheers, Dale