al 5, denied 3 (deny-flow-max 4096)
I'll have to live with this until I can upgrade.
Wim
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Yourtchenko [mailto:ayour...@cisco.com]
Sent: woensdag 16 december 2009 19:35
To: Holemans Wim
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] FWSM loggin
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009, Tony Varriale wrote:
gets the ACL exploded so much that it does not fit into the network
processors anymore - then the previously compiled version is being used -
but generally you get a pretty prominent warning about that.
Nope...NP was fine. How we found it was the AC
- Original Message -
From: "Andrew Yourtchenko"
To: "Tony Varriale"
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 12:54 PM
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] FWSM logging problem
That's indeed the proper thing to do. And please, after making sure - also
let the case owner
o-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Tony Varriale
Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 1:34 PM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] FWSM logging problem
Sorry...Access Control Entry in an ACL on FWSM.
What code are you running on 6500 and ACE that you are having these issues?
I seen t
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009, Holemans Wim wrote:
It seems our FWSM doesn't log all denied ACLs. I blocked an IP address
on our FWSM and wanted to see whomever on campus is trying to access
this address (Botnet C&C).
I added the following line in the ACL (even raised priority), you can
see that the rule
9 9:44 AM
Subject: [c-nsp] FWSM logging problem
It seems our FWSM doesn't log all denied ACLs. I blocked an IP address
on our FWSM and wanted to see whomever on campus is trying to access
this address (Botnet C&C).
I added the following line in the ACL (even raised priority), you can
see th
when that happens.
Nick
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Tony Varriale
Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 12:31 PM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] FWSM logging problem
What code are y
-Original Message-
> From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:
> cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Tony Varriale
> Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 12:31 PM
> To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] FWSM logging problem
>
> What code are you on?
happens.
Nick
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Tony Varriale
Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 12:31 PM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] FWSM logging problem
What code are you on?
These
From: "Holemans Wim"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 9:44 AM
Subject: [c-nsp] FWSM logging problem
It seems our FWSM doesn't log all denied ACLs. I blocked an IP address
on our FWSM and wanted to see whomever on campus is trying to access
this address (Botnet C&am
It seems our FWSM doesn't log all denied ACLs. I blocked an IP address
on our FWSM and wanted to see whomever on campus is trying to access
this address (Botnet C&C).
I added the following line in the ACL (even raised priority), you can
see that the rules triggers when I tried to telnet the addres
11 matches
Mail list logo
