I'm working on getting a call going with whomever is involved in the breakage
of downloads again.
Sent from my iThing
On Sep 20, 2010, at 1:54 AM, Sridhar Ayengar wrote:
> Gert Doering wrote:
>>> I may be able to lead the cabal if folks so desire, rounding up the
>>> right people from the cis
Gert Doering wrote:
I may be able to lead the cabal if folks so desire, rounding up the
right people from the cisco side.
Count me in. But you know that already :-)
Me too, FWIW.
Peace... Sridhar
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.
On 2010-09-16 01:05, Heath Jones wrote:
Just wondering.. Does IBLM access some generic(ish) webservice back to base
(cisco) for updates to the EoL/S etc? What if the address of that could make
its way around...
The tool is offline. You gather the info about the network, upload it
in IBLM-specif
Just wondering.. Does IBLM access some generic(ish) webservice back to base
(cisco) for updates to the EoL/S etc? What if the address of that could make
its way around...
2010/9/15 Łukasz Bromirski
> On 2010-09-16 00:38, Alan Buxey wrote:
>
> also, to charge for this? hello? theres plenty of f
On 2010-09-16 00:38, Alan Buxey wrote:
also, to charge for this? hello? theres plenty of free tools out there
that can make an inventory of a companies network...given enough information
and seeding. most of these tools are now available as virtual images to make
the task a little easier too.
On 2010-09-16 00:04, Peter Rathlev wrote:
The report IS free. You're propably being charged by a Partner.
That is correct. The partner charged.
That's of course doable - Cisco can't forbid Partner to ask for
money for the work they're putting into sending some engineer to
do the work. However
Hi,
> But: He says that even when AS performs the IBLM, we still have to pay.
> We can get a refund when purchasing new equipment later, but still have
> to pay up front.
given that the IBLM is nothing more than a method by which
service partners can gain "excellent visibility into your customer
...theres always the CCIE option for CCO download access...or are they getting
rid of that too? :-(
alan
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail
On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 23:20 +0200, Łukasz Bromirski wrote:
> On 2010-09-15 23:05, Peter Rathlev wrote:
> > And the report is free[2].
> > [2]: Except you have to pay for them to actually make the report.
> > (I havn't figured out what the "free" thing is then.)
>
> The report IS free. You're
On 2010-09-15 23:05, Gert Doering wrote:
If there's neither a convenient security update nor a contract, then
it's getting interesting - theoretically, you can buy IOS updates. In
practice, nearly no cisco partner/reseller seems to understand *how* to
do that. At some time in the past, we boug
On 2010-09-15 23:05, Peter Rathlev wrote:
And the report is free[2].
> [2]: Except you have to pay for them to actually make the report.
> (I havn't figured out what the "free" thing is then.)
The report IS free. You're propably being charged by a Partner.
One way or another, if anyone is
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 01:43:46PM -0700, Seth Mattinen wrote:
> How would this work for old unsupported equipment?
For security updates, you can go through TAC, and get the updates even
if you have no contract.
If there's neither a convenient security update nor a contract, then
it's gettin
On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 13:43 -0700, Seth Mattinen wrote:
> On 9/15/2010 13:32, Asbjorn Hojmark - Lists wrote:
> > Active service contracts, yes that's what they're doing. (They have
> > informed us partners). It doesn't have to be SMARTnet contracts,
> > though.
>
> How would this work for old unsu
On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 22:32 +0200, Asbjorn Hojmark - Lists wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 21:13:35 +0100, you wrote:
> > It's also looks like Cisco may be vaguely moving in the direction of
> > locking CCO accounts down to be able to access only software downloads
> > for which there are active smart
On 9/15/2010 13:32, Asbjorn Hojmark - Lists wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 21:13:35 +0100, you wrote:
>
>> It's also looks like Cisco may be vaguely moving in the direction of
>> locking CCO accounts down to be able to access only software downloads
>> for which there are active smartnet contracts.
On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 22:02:35 +0300, you wrote:
> I'd be perfectly happy to have reliable RSS feed for new and removed
> IOS releases.
Hahaha. Good one.
They can't even do that for new products.
-A
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
On Sep 15, 2010, at 4:32 PM, Asbjorn Hojmark - Lists wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 21:13:35 +0100, you wrote:
>
>> It's also looks like Cisco may be vaguely moving in the direction of
>> locking CCO accounts down to be able to access only software downloads
>> for which there are active smartnet
On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 21:13:35 +0100, you wrote:
> It's also looks like Cisco may be vaguely moving in the direction of
> locking CCO accounts down to be able to access only software downloads
> for which there are active smartnet contracts.
Active service contracts, yes that's what they're doing.
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 08:58:05PM -0400, Jared Mauch wrote:
> I may be able to lead the cabal if folks so desire, rounding up the
> right people from the cisco side.
Count me in. But you know that already :-)
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 10:37:25AM -0800, Leif Sawyer wrote:
> If you take it a step further and use ssh keys, then you've got an additional
> layer of security for them.
I don't think Cisco understands "ssh keys".
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
On Tue, 14 Sep 2010, Gert Doering wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 09:00:01AM -0400, Jason Gurtz wrote:
This is a poor decision and should be reconsidered; Cisco should be
expanding, not reducing FTP access. One should be able to login via ftp
with their CCO ID/password and download full en
On 9/14/2010 6:53 PM, Rubens Kuhl wrote:
> If legal requires many confirmations before downloading software
> image, Cisco Online could have telnet access and X/Y/Zmodem file
> transfers. Very modern solution, indeed.
>
IPS images and signatures are behind the same "storefront", yet the
devices t
See below
Sent from my iThing
On Sep 14, 2010, at 5:02 PM, Gert Doering wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 02:36:07PM +0100, David Freedman wrote:
>> As much as I disagree with the decision, I can understand that they may
>> have a complex set of processes and audit requirements behind t
I don't disagree with this change being a problem, but...
Once upon a time, William F. Maton Sotomayor said:
> FTP has been indispensible, especially considering how much larger the
> images are getting and FTP's transfer efficiencies over HTTP start to
> show.
"FTP's transfer efficiencies ove
If legal requires many confirmations before downloading software
image, Cisco Online could have telnet access and X/Y/Zmodem file
transfers. Very modern solution, indeed.
Rubens
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 10:00 AM, Jason Gurtz wrote:
> [Comments in-line]
>
>> From: ftp_download_feedback(mailer l
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 02:36:07PM +0100, David Freedman wrote:
> As much as I disagree with the decision, I can understand that they may
> have a complex set of processes and audit requirements behind this (the
> site), i.e having users click "I Agree" before every download (and not
> making
On 14/09/2010 14:36, David Freedman wrote:
> As much as I disagree with the decision, I can understand that they may
> have a complex set of processes and audit requirements behind this (the
> site), i.e having users click "I Agree" before every download (and not
> making this implicit through down
On 14/09/2010 14:40, William F. Maton Sotomayor wrote:
> FTP has been indispensible, especially considering how much larger the
> images are getting and FTP's transfer efficiencies over HTTP start to show.
But that's why they've provided the Java download manager! To make the
download experience
ubject: Re: [c-nsp] Feedback on upcoming removal of FTP
> access to secured software
>
> >> ftp.cisco.com beginning early October 2010.
> >
> > Dear Cisco Manager:
> >
> > This is a poor decision and should be reconsidered; Cisco should be
> > expandi
On (2010-09-14 09:00 -0400), Jason Gurtz wrote:
> > Cisco has recently reviewed its download processes and will only be
> > providing anonymous access for software in the future via ftp.cisco.com.
> [...]
> > This is a courtesy notice informing you that any software requiring
> login
> > or contra
On 9/14/10 6:00 AM, Jason Gurtz wrote:
> [Comments in-line]
>
>> From: ftp_download_feedback(mailer list)
>> [mailto:ftp_download_feedb...@cisco.com]
>> Sent: Monday, September 13, 2010 20:47
>> Subject: Important Message from Cisco Technical Support Manager,
> Software
>> Downloads
>>
>>
>> Cis
On 9/14/2010 9:18 AM, Gert Doering wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 09:00:01AM -0400, Jason Gurtz wrote:
>> This is a poor decision and should be reconsidered; Cisco should be
>> expanding, not reducing FTP access. One should be able to login via ftp
>> with their CCO ID/password and down
Hi,
> On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 09:00:01AM -0400, Jason Gurtz wrote:
> > This is a poor decision and should be reconsidered; Cisco should be
> > expanding, not reducing FTP access. One should be able to login via ftp
> > with their CCO ID/password and download full encryption software. If
> > busi
On Tue, 14 Sep 2010, Gert Doering wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 09:00:01AM -0400, Jason Gurtz wrote:
This is a poor decision and should be reconsidered; Cisco should be
expanding, not reducing FTP access. One should be able to login via ftp
with their CCO ID/password and download full en
>> ftp.cisco.com beginning early October 2010.
>
> Dear Cisco Manager:
>
> This is a poor decision and should be reconsidered; Cisco should be
> expanding, not reducing FTP access. One should be able to login via ftp
> with their CCO ID/password and download full encryption software. If
> busin
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 09:00:01AM -0400, Jason Gurtz wrote:
> This is a poor decision and should be reconsidered; Cisco should be
> expanding, not reducing FTP access. One should be able to login via ftp
> with their CCO ID/password and download full encryption software. If
> business needs
[Comments in-line]
> From: ftp_download_feedback(mailer list)
> [mailto:ftp_download_feedb...@cisco.com]
> Sent: Monday, September 13, 2010 20:47
> Subject: Important Message from Cisco Technical Support Manager,
Software
> Downloads
>
>
> Cisco has recently reviewed its download processes and
37 matches
Mail list logo
