> I think Engel may have mis-read my email and thought I was on a trunk
> port in which case what he wrote would have been correct. In my case
> though I was on an access port. Most of that port's config had been
> wiped clean leaving only switchport and mode access. I could avoid the
> issue in
Higham, Josh wrote:
Either I'm misunderstanding what you are saying, or this is incorrect.
The native VLAN identifier just dictates what frames are tagged, it
doesn't control whether they are sent. So if the native vlan is 999,
with a default config port is in vlan 1, if the port receives traff
> From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
> [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
> Engelhard Labiro
>
> On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 2:22 AM, Justin Shore
> wrote:
>
> > And by all means DO NOT USE VLAN 1. That's what bit me in
> the ass last
> > night. An unconfigured 7600 LA
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 2:22 AM, Justin Shore wrote:
> And by all means DO NOT USE VLAN 1. That's what bit me in the ass last
> night. An unconfigured 7600 LAN port with switchport, mode access and no
> access vlan defined was a piece in the puzzle of the cluster that was my
> evening last night
