Re: [c-nsp] Horrible MPPP Performance SOLVED

2009-03-06 Thread Michael K. Smith
Hello Everyone: Sorry for the post-to-my-own-post. Jeremy Gaddis was kind enough not to out me on the list, but what the hey. I only had one 64k channel enabled on each T-1. > channel-group 0 timeslots 24 I used to know T-1's, I swear. Thanks Jeremy! Regards, Mike On 3/6/09 7:48 PM, "Mic

Re: [c-nsp] Horrible MPPP Performance

2009-03-06 Thread Michael K. Smith
Hello Seth: On 3/6/09 8:12 PM, "Seth Mattinen" wrote: > Michael K. Smith wrote: >> Hello Everyone: >> >> I have two 2800 series routers with 4, clear-channel T-1's between. I'm >> running MPPP with the 4 T1's in the bundle. Performance is *awful*. 100 >> byte packets, 40 ms with 98% deliver

Re: [c-nsp] Horrible MPPP Performance

2009-03-06 Thread Seth Mattinen
Michael K. Smith wrote: > Hello Everyone: > > I have two 2800 series routers with 4, clear-channel T-1's between. I'm > running MPPP with the 4 T1's in the bundle. Performance is *awful*. 100 > byte packets, 40 ms with 98% delivered. 1500 byte packets, 900 ms latency > with 25% packet loss. >

[c-nsp] Horrible MPPP Performance

2009-03-06 Thread Michael K. Smith
Hello Everyone: I have two 2800 series routers with 4, clear-channel T-1's between. I'm running MPPP with the 4 T1's in the bundle. Performance is *awful*. 100 byte packets, 40 ms with 98% delivered. 1500 byte packets, 900 ms latency with 25% packet loss. Here are my config snippets from the