Re: [c-nsp] IEEE 802.1P QoS Issue........

*show policy-map interface GigabitEthernet0/2.17* GigabitEthernet0/2.17 Service-policy output: policy_cos Class-map: class-COS (match-all) 45788 packets, 58522561 bytes 30 second offered rate 1226000 bps, drop rate bps Match: access-group 100 QoS Set

Re: [c-nsp] IEEE 802.1P QoS Issue........

Hi, please always CC c-nsp. > It's a Cisco 7206 box with the IOS c7200-adventerprisek9-mz.152-4.S5.bin Alright, its not a switch, but a software router. Its should be possible to do this, even on egress. Can you post the output of: show policy-map interface GigabitEthernet0/2.17 Regards,

Re: [c-nsp] IEEE 802.1P QoS Issue........

On 2 Nov 2015 03:15, "Methsri Wickramarathna" wrote: > > Hi every one, > > I have purchased a fiber link and local ISP requested us to set Class of > Service ( CoS ) value based on the precentage level Voice , Video , > Business Critical & Best effot. Further they have

Re: [c-nsp] IEEE 802.1P QoS Issue........

Plug away :) , I'm going to check out your software -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of James Bensley Sent: 06 November 2015 20:07 To: Methsri Wickramarathna; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] IEEE 802.1P QoS Issue

Re: [c-nsp] IEEE 802.1P QoS Issue........

On Mon, 2015-11-02 at 08:40 +0530, Methsri Wickramarathna wrote: > I have purchased a fiber link and local ISP requested us to set Class > of Service ( CoS ) value based on the precentage level Voice , Video , > Business Critical & Best effot. Further they have requested us to > follow the IEEE

Re: [c-nsp] IEEE 802.1P QoS Issue........

> The 802.1p bits are carried in the 802.1Q tag Yes, but ... > , so you would have to mark  on the physical interface, > not the subinterface. Not so true. Just because you are on a subinterface, doesn't mean you can't set cos values. Yes, the COS field isn't theoretically "visible" if you

Re: [c-nsp] IEEE 802.1P QoS Issue........

Does the edge have the appropriate service policy in an outbound direction to you applied? What is the CPE? On most CPE's, I prefer to apply the outbound service policy to the physical interface - it acts like a catch-all for all outgoing traffic. (personal preference I guess) You can verify

Re: [c-nsp] IEEE 802.1P QoS Issue........

On Mon, 2015-11-02 at 16:29 +0100, Lukas Tribus wrote: > > , so you would have to mark on the physical interface, > > not the subinterface. > > Not so true. Just because you are on a subinterface, doesn't mean > you can't set cos values. Interesting. I was genuinely unaware of that, since I

Re: [c-nsp] IEEE 802.1P QoS Issue........

> But when I analyzed the traffic ( using Wireshark ) from the destination , > I couldn't find relevant fields were confgiured. There are a lot of reasons you won't see it at the destination (for example, if destination is actually untagged, there is a non-COS transparent interconnect switch

[c-nsp] IEEE 802.1P QoS Issue........

Hi every one, I have purchased a fiber link and local ISP requested us to set Class of Service ( CoS ) value based on the precentage level Voice , Video , Business Critical & Best effot. Further they have requested us to follow the IEEE 802.1p standard. I have configured the router interface