Re: [c-nsp] IOS XR SFP DOM in SNMP

2014-05-28 Thread gu...@golas.ru
Hello all, I want pay you attention on monitoring via SNMP not only for ASR9001. On ASR9006 also very strange situation. This is my graph for ASR9006 on IOS XR 4.x and 5.x release. http://s28.postimg.org/cze9fz1il/txrx.png The SNMP script was same, but after migration to 5.x release I see

Re: [c-nsp] IOS XR SFP DOM in SNMP

2014-05-28 Thread brad dreisbach
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 10:27:51AM +0400, gu...@golas.ru wrote: Hello all, I want pay you attention on monitoring via SNMP not only for ASR9001. On ASR9006 also very strange situation. This is my graph for ASR9006 on IOS XR 4.x and 5.x release. http://s28.postimg.org/cze9fz1il/txrx.png The

Re: [c-nsp] IOS XR SFP DOM in SNMP

2014-05-27 Thread Steve Colam
Folks, This is what we got back from TAC Thu, 6 Feb 2014: --- Thank you for update. Here is what I found: this is day 1 behavior (always was there), it's a known issue which is tracked by bug CSCuh86588. the fix is being tested and will be included in 520 release, which is due in mid-June

[c-nsp] IOS XR SFP DOM in SNMP

2014-05-12 Thread Nikolay Shopik
Hey, Does anyone have DOM information in SNMP on IOS XR (ASR9001)? All we got is -32768 on all modules. So far we only tested on 4.3.2, just wonder if they actually fixed on more recent releases. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net

Re: [c-nsp] IOS XR SFP DOM in SNMP

2014-05-12 Thread gu...@golas.ru
Hello Nikolay, I opened case for this issue for 4.3.1 in august 2013. Cisco promised fix in 5.1.1. Created DDTS CSCuh86588. I can confirm that issue doesn't fixed in 5.1.1. On Mon, 12 May 2014 15:49:54 +0400 Nikolay Shopik sho...@inblock.ru wrote: Hey, Does anyone have DOM information in

Re: [c-nsp] IOS XR SFP DOM in SNMP

2014-05-12 Thread Jared Mauch
It has not been fixed and has been junked by cisco as an “enhancement” vs “bug” - Jared On May 12, 2014, at 8:27 AM, gu...@golas.ru wrote: Hello Nikolay, I opened case for this issue for 4.3.1 in august 2013. Cisco promised fix in 5.1.1. Created DDTS CSCuh86588. I can confirm that issue