Re: [c-nsp] IOSXR 4.2.3

2013-06-19 Thread Mark Tinka
On Sunday, January 27, 2013 03:23:04 AM Jason Lixfeld wrote: > Also, the lack of ISSU - still - makes these boxes > impossible to deploy as customer termination devices. > The plethora of mandatory reboot SMUs that come up for > this platform, no matter what version, is horrendous. > Also, any t

Re: [c-nsp] IOSXR 4.2.3

2013-01-27 Thread McEvilly, Patrick
Only issue we ran into was bug CSCuc15603. Using show bgp ipv4 uni" with the "advertised" keyword causes a memory leak in BGP process. It will work for a while but then run out of available memory to execute the command successfully. I guess it will eventually cause BGP process to restart (we

Re: [c-nsp] IOSXR 4.2.3

2013-01-27 Thread Adam Vitkovsky
Remote LFA doesn't work on 4.2.3 adam ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] IOSXR 4.2.3

2013-01-27 Thread Mikael Abrahamsson
On Sun, 27 Jan 2013, Grzegorz Janoszka wrote: Special repartition for 4.2.3? Which flash did you have? Was it 2G or 4G? This is for 2G flash on the RSP2 on ASR9k. It changes the partition sizes from 1.5G/0.5G to 1.8G/0.2G (or thereabout), freeing up ~300 megabyte on disk0:. -- Mikael Abrah

Re: [c-nsp] IOSXR 4.2.3

2013-01-27 Thread Grzegorz Janoszka
On 27-01-13 02:23, Jason Lixfeld wrote: > No new problems that I have observed, although having to repartition the > flash drives on the RSPs in order to install is certainly annoying. Jason, Special repartition for 4.2.3? Which flash did you have? Was it 2G or 4G? -- Grzegorz Janoszka ___

Re: [c-nsp] IOSXR 4.2.3

2013-01-27 Thread Mikael Abrahamsson
On Sat, 26 Jan 2013, judy teng wrote: Does somebody use code IOSXR 4.2.3? Any comment? Seems to work ok, smu pack 2 was just released for the ASR9k which seems to fix most important known problems (and also for 4.2.3 now actually fully supercedes most if not all earlier smu:s solving the tot

Re: [c-nsp] IOSXR 4.2.3

2013-01-27 Thread Tassos Chatzithomaoglou
We have been using it for some time on ASR9k & CRS (mainly OSPF, BGP, (EoM|M|V)PLS, IPv6, LAG) without any major issues until now. Although there is preliminary support for ISSU SMUs, we aren't thinking to risk it. So we plan on staying on this version until ISSU become mature in 4.3.x. -- Tasso

Re: [c-nsp] IOSXR 4.2.3

2013-01-26 Thread Jason Lixfeld
No new problems that I have observed, although having to repartition the flash drives on the RSPs in order to install is certainly annoying. Also, the lack of ISSU - still - makes these boxes impossible to deploy as customer termination devices. The plethora of mandatory reboot SMUs that come

[c-nsp] IOSXR 4.2.3

2013-01-26 Thread judy teng
Does somebody use code IOSXR 4.2.3? Any comment? Thanks, JT ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/