On (2013-09-13 10:09 +0200), Adam Vitkovsky wrote:
Regarding the ISSU I heard there's a plan to run something like two codes on
the LC asics so that one can be upgraded while the other sill performs the
forwarding duties.
Interesting. I wonder if they do this in NPUs like EZ and nPower,
Regarding the ISSU I heard there's a plan to run something like two codes on
the LC asics so that one can be upgraded while the other sill performs the
forwarding duties.
As far as the upgrade process goes. Yes it's a bit more complex than simple
next-next-next-, but once you've done 13 in a
On 30/08/2013 21:59, Tom Cooper wrote:
Software by Cisco. That's the first mistake.
well no, it's not. Cisco is a very large company with a huge number of
programmers working on a wide variety of platforms. Writing them all off
like this is unfair.
In the case of e.g. XR, the compiled
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 04:43:30PM +0200, Florian Lohoff wrote:
I wonder then dont have a ioxrupdates.cisco.com for the devices to
nightly download the SMUs and reload.
Be careful what you're asking for... especially the and reload bit :-)
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 09:37:47AM +0100, Nick Hilliard wrote:
On 30/08/2013 08:40, Gert Doering wrote:
I was thinking about ASR9k, which have EIGRP, and a modular OS :-)
And an entirely new category of things to complain about! I can't wait to
see how you like the software upgrade process
On 30/08/2013 15:43, Florian Lohoff wrote:
I couldnt believe my eyes cisco isnt ashamed to give something like this
out to customers.
Clearly you haven't ever looked at the Nexus 1000v virtual switch for esxi.
Nick
___
cisco-nsp mailing list
Software by Cisco. That's the first mistake.
On Aug 30, 2013 12:14 PM, Nick Hilliard n...@foobar.org wrote:
On 30/08/2013 15:43, Florian Lohoff wrote:
I couldnt believe my eyes cisco isnt ashamed to give something like this
out to customers.
Clearly you haven't ever looked at the Nexus
