On Tuesday 18 August 2009 09:24:47 pm Ibrahim Abo Zaid
wrote:
> To make it clearer , i don't have a problem with default
> route on R1 i have a problem with the default route on R2
> and R3
As Yuri had suggested, have you tried simplifying your IS-IS
configuration by having only a single instan
Level-1 Link State Database:
>> LSPID LSP Seq Num LSP Checksum LSP Holdtime
>> ATT/P/OL
>> R1.00-00* 0x0003 0x55241173 0/0/0
>> R2.00-00 0x0003 0x7E42 1161 1/0/0
>> R3.00-00
gt; From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:
> cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ibrahim Abo Zaid
> Sent: Monday, August 17, 2009 2:47 PM
> To: cisco_nsp; ci...@groupstudy.com
> Subject: [c-nsp] ISIS Problem
>
> Hi All
>
> I have a problem with the below ISIS toplog
m Abo Zaid wrote:
> From: Ibrahim Abo Zaid
> Subject: [c-nsp] ISIS Problem
> To: "cisco_nsp" , ci...@groupstudy.com
> Date: Monday, August 17, 2009, 1:47 PM
> Hi All
>
> I have a problem with the below ISIS toplogy , All ADJ of
> R1 are L1 and
> interface between
al Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ibrahim Abo Zaid
Sent: Monday, August 17, 2009 2:47 PM
To: cisco_nsp; ci...@groupstudy.com
Subject: [c-nsp] ISIS Problem
Hi All
I have a problem with the below ISIS toplogy , All ADJ of R1
Hi All
I have a problem with the below ISIS toplogy , All ADJ of R1 are L1 and
interface between R2 is in A2 from R2 side and in A3 side from R3 side
so R2 and R3 have L2-ADJ betwene them , as expected both R2 and R3 send LSP
with ATT bit set so R1 has 2 L1 default routes point to both R2 and R3 ,
