+2 for isc dhpcd & bind (sorry for being off-topic though).
--
Regards,
Ge Moua
moua0...@umn.edu
Univ of Minn Alumnus
--
On 4/24/13 1:12 PM, a.l.m.bu...@lboro.ac.uk wrote:
Hi,
My thoughts are that this group is very knowledgeable about all networking
topics and it makes sense to me
this grou
Hi,
> My thoughts are that this group is very knowledgeable about all networking
> topics and it makes sense to me
this group works because its a forum dedicated to a particular vendor
and specific remit. the SnR is pretty good and you get answers because
its a specific group FOR that purpose. i
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 01:42:05PM -0400, harbor235 wrote:
> My thoughts are that this group is very knowledgeable about all networking
> topics and it makes sense to me
> that someone may have ran across this issue.
Indeed, that's a great idea. Find a place where knowledgeable people
discus
My thoughts are that this group is very knowledgeable about all networking
topics and it makes sense to me
that someone may have ran across this issue.
Mike
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 10:08 AM, Gert Doering wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 09:08:40AM -0400, harbor235 wrote:
> > I am being
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 09:08:40AM -0400, harbor235 wrote:
> I am being told that InfoBlox management is restricted to one interface
> only.
Cisco is selling InfoBlox gear now?
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
I am being told that InfoBlox management is restricted to one interface
only. For example,
once the management GUI is bound to an interface all management traffic is
now bound to
that same interface only, e.g. SNMP, SYSLOG, SSH, etc ..
I am hoping this is not the case and this is configurable
Does anyone here is using Infoblox DHCP in there network ?
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
