Re: [c-nsp] Load-sharing between two routing protocols with same administrative distance?

On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 10:09:53AM +0100, Christian Meutes wrote: > >redistribute routes from one protocol into another and use route-maps > >to change the metrics and route 'type' (protocol dependent) such that > >the protocol considers them equal cost. > > > >the usual warnings about route redist

Re: [c-nsp] Load-sharing between two routing protocols with same administrative distance?

Hi, --On Friday, 14. November 2008 11:57 -0800 bill fumerola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: redistribute routes from one protocol into another and use route-maps to change the metrics and route 'type' (protocol dependent) such that the protocol considers them equal cost. the usual warnings about

Re: [c-nsp] Load-sharing between two routing protocols with same administrative distance?

On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 04:02:40PM -0200, Everton da Silva Marques wrote: > Two routing protocols, Same administrative distance? > http://www.internetworkexpert.org/2007/12/31/two-routing-protocols-same-administrative-distance/ > > I am wondering: any hint on how to work-around such > a behavior (

[c-nsp] Load-sharing between two routing protocols with same administrative distance?

Hi, While trying to load-share between routes with same administrative distance from distinct routing protocols, I found this: What if I configure the administrative distance to be the same for two routing protocols? Will the router install routes from each routing protocol and allow me t