On 2/Oct/15 18:38, James Bensley wrote:
> Yep, this.
>
> SVIs and port-channels. B!
Well, for LAG's you can't run away from using a software interface, as
you need some way to control all links in the LAG.
My only issue with LAG's from Cisco is the lack of LAG policing support.
Mark.
On 1/Oct/15 10:29, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> yep, that's correct. If you want to use qos on an SVI, you need to attach
> the service policy to the service policy on the physical interface(s).
> Better still, don't use SVIs on this platform if you can get away with
> using physical ports.
Would be
On 1 October 2015 at 09:29, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> don't use SVIs on this platform if you can get away with
> using physical ports.
Yep, this.
SVIs and port-channels. B!
Cheers,
James.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://
Thanks guys for the kind replies
Nick , you mean like a hierarchical QoS ? as the physical interface has a lot
of service-instances configured for multiple Vlans
Thanks
> To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> From: n...@foobar.org
> Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 09:29:52 +0100
> Subject: Re: [c
On 01/10/2015 09:20, Mohammad Khalil wrote:
> “You can attach service policies to switchports, routed ports, or EFPs.
> However, you cannot attach a service policy to a physical port that is
> configured with service instances (EFPs) and you cannot attach service
> policies to switch virtual
> int
Kindly I’m trying to configure QoS for traffic policing on
one of our PEs (ME3600), but I’m receiving an error when I try to apply it on
an SVI, I tried to figure out the problem but I found the following on one of
Cisco’s documents :
“You can attach service policies to switchports, routed por
n O'Connor'
mailto:darre...@outlook.com>>, 'Nick Ryce'
mailto:n...@fluency.net.uk>>,
"cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>"
mailto:cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>>
Subject: RE: [c-nsp] ME3600 QoS
Hi Waris,
This issue was d
;mailto:cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>"
mailto:cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>>
Subject: RE: [c-nsp] ME3600 QoS
Hi Waris,
This issue was discovered on 15.3(1)S2.
The “multicast ingress to port-channel punted to CPU” issue is persistent in
15.3(2)S2 as well.
adam
From: Waris Sagheer
I was using 15.2 but now got 15.3 installed on my lab box
Thanks
Darren
http://www.mellowd.co.uk/ccie
From: wa...@cisco.com
To: adam.vitkov...@swan.sk; darre...@outlook.com; n...@fluency.net.uk;
cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ME3600 QoS
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2013 16:59:03 +
"cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>"
mailto:cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>>
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ME3600 QoS
Interesting we've had some 100% CPU until reload ourselves. It was related
to Port-channel and mcast.
adam
From: Darren O'Connor [mai
> From: adam.vitkov...@swan.sk
> To: n...@fluency.net.uk; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2013 14:52:17 +0200
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ME3600 QoS
>
> > Can be applied to the member ports of the channel.
> > Also you can't apply service policies to EFP'
kov...@swan.sk
> To: n...@fluency.net.uk; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2013 14:52:17 +0200
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ME3600 QoS
>
> > Can be applied to the member ports of the channel.
> > Also you can't apply service policies to EFP's on a port channel e
> Can be applied to the member ports of the channel.
> Also you can't apply service policies to EFP's on a port channel either.
Thus my conclusion that port-channel interfaces on ME3600 are useless so far
No incoming multicast
No BFD with ASR9k
No QOS
Though I'm not sure whether some of this
Hi Adam,
Just reached the same conclusion.
Can be applied to the member ports of the channel. Also you can't apply
service policies to EFP's on a port channel either.
Nick
--
Nick Ryce
Fluency Communications Ltd.
e. n...@fluency.net.uk
w. http://fluency.net.uk/
t. 0845 874 7000
On 07/08
Hi Nick,
> QoS: Invalid target for service-policy
I got the same error when I tried to apply a service-policy to port-channel
interface and learned that policy has to be applied to a physical ports
associated with the channel instead.
So I'm wondering whether your SW version supports applying of
Hi,
I suspect that if you use 'remaining percent' you might to define the
overall output speed for the service instance. You also have to
specify interface output speed using policy (for example 'shape
average 10' for 1G interface).
kind regards
Pshem
On 7 August 2013 20:59, Nick Ryce
Hi Nick,
I have something simular in my lab but without 'level 1' which works.
class-map match-all dscp41
match ip dscp af41
policy-map IPTV-QOS
class IPTV
priority
class class-default
bandwidth remaining percent 75
dr-se-mlm-stg3-2#sh policy-map int g0/23
GigabitEthernet0/23
Servi
Hi Guys,
I am trying to to do some basic QoS to prioritise packets marked with DSCP EF
on EFP's but keep getting errors as below:
SW1.WAV-EDI(config-if-srv)#service-policy output Voip
QoS: Invalid target for service-policy
QoS: Configuration errors for policy map Voip
Class-map and policy map a
Muthukumar Rajagopalan
Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2012 3:13 AM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] ME3600 QOS internal mapping
Hi Folks,
I want to understand the internal mapping on the ME3600 switch with identical
to ME3750 "mls qos trust". I understand that ME3600 default behav
Hi Folks,
I want to understand the internal mapping on the ME3600 switch with
identical to ME3750 "mls qos trust". I understand that ME3600 default
behaviour is to trust all DSCP/IPP values. Please provide some uick
reference on this will highly Appreciated.
Thanks,
Muthu
20 matches
Mail list logo
