Hey,
> Now as you switched to MPLS to the access layer approach and literally
> creating p2p wires between two customer devices Customers should
> understand they cannot involve you with mac learning issues between two
> datacenters
Well, you must keep in mind that many setups require local-tail
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ME3600X Embedded Packet Capture
Hi Waris,
Thanks, I hadn't tested the bridging mode yet on this platform but have used
on the ES+ linecards. Wouldn't be looking to use all the time as I like the
per port vlan scope when doing the xconnect on the evc.
Reconfiguring t
Regards,
Waris
-Original Message-
From: Ivan [mailto:cisco-...@itpro.co.nz]
Sent: Sunday, August 12, 2012 7:17 PM
To: Pshem Kowalczyk
Cc: Ivan; Waris Sagheer (waris); cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ME3600X Embedded Packet Capture
Hi,
Yes, as far as I understand there
: Pshem Kowalczyk
Cc: Ivan; Waris Sagheer (waris); cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ME3600X Embedded Packet Capture
Hi,
Yes, as far as I understand there is no mac learning which is great for
resource utilisation and scalability. No requirement other than "it is helpful
Hi,
Yes, as far as I understand there is no mac learning which is great for
resource utilisation and scalability. No requirement other than "it is
helpful for troubleshooting" to see any macs.
Cheers
Ivan
> Hi,
>
>
> On 11 August 2012 10:32, Ivan wrote:
>
> {cut}
>
>> xconnect 1.2.3.4 666 en
Hi,
On 11 August 2012 10:32, Ivan wrote:
{cut}
> xconnect 1.2.3.4 666 encapsulation mpls
Speaking from general experience - this is the culprit. In
point-to-point L2VPNs there is (usually, I admit I'm not sure if
that's the case on 3600x) no MAC address learning (which nicely
conserves the r
012 3:27 AM
To: Waris Sagheer (waris)
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ME3600X Embedded Packet Capture
Hi Waris,
I had come across that bug referring to EPC in "Release Notes for the Cisco ME 3800X
and ME 3600X Switch" -
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/metr
: Waris Sagheer (waris)
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ME3600X Embedded Packet Capture
Hi Waris,
I had come across that bug referring to EPC in "Release Notes for the Cisco ME
3800X and ME 3600X Switch" -
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/metro/me3600x_3800
t capture on ME3600X.
Regards,
Waris
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ivan
Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2012 10:35 PM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] ME3600X Embedded Packet Capture
Hi,
Has anyone
10:35 PM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] ME3600X Embedded Packet Capture
Hi,
Has anyone used Embedded Packet Capture on the ME3600X successfully? If so are
their any gotchas to be weary of?
The only things that come up when I search for this is CSCtq11526 Embedded
Packet Capture
Hi,
Has anyone used Embedded Packet Capture on the ME3600X successfully? If
so are their any gotchas to be weary of?
The only things that come up when I search for this is CSCtq11526 Embedded
Packet Capture stops BFD neighbor adjacency, but have been unable to find
details of what packets can be
11 matches
Mail list logo
