Re: [c-nsp] MPLS - 6500's

2008-05-05 Thread Paul Stewart
7:16 PM To: Paul Stewart Cc: 'Justin M. Streiner'; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] MPLS - 6500's You may want to look at L2TPv3 unless you really need TE features. It's supported on more platforms and supported in n

Re: [c-nsp] MPLS - 6500's

2008-05-05 Thread Phil Bedard
OTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Justin M. > Streiner > Sent: Monday, May 05, 2008 4:40 PM > To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] MPLS - 6500's > > On Mon, 5 May 2008, Paul Stewart wrote: > >> With a 6500 Catalyst, regular line cards

Re: [c-nsp] MPLS - 6500's

2008-05-05 Thread Justin M. Streiner
On Mon, 5 May 2008, Paul Stewart wrote: > So if someone wanted to build a low traffic volume, "bare bones" MPLS > network could they not use: > > Cisco 7206VXR-NPE-G1 for P router > Cisco 3825 or 2821 for PE router I do have a tunnel landing on a 3845, but at the time I had very few options for

Re: [c-nsp] MPLS - 6500's

2008-05-05 Thread Phil Bedard
There are no restrictions for MPLS on the SUP2/MSFC2 since it's completely unsupported. :) You need an OSM to do MPLS on those platforms. Phil On May 5, 2008, at 4:39 PM, Justin M. Streiner wrote: > On Mon, 5 May 2008, Paul Stewart wrote: > >> With a 6500 Catalyst, regular line cards, and S

Re: [c-nsp] MPLS - 6500's

2008-05-05 Thread Phil Bedard
What exactly are you trying to do with MPLS? PFC3 will support most things without additional modules (OSM,SIP) with the most notable exception being local switching. You can get around that by looping in and out of the box if you need to. No VPLS as well, but I'm not too keen on runnin

Re: [c-nsp] MPLS - 6500's

2008-05-05 Thread Paul Stewart
05, 2008 4:40 PM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] MPLS - 6500's On Mon, 5 May 2008, Paul Stewart wrote: > With a 6500 Catalyst, regular line cards, and Sup720-3BXL - what can you NOT > do with MPLS on these chassis? Is it "just" VPLS that requires an O

Re: [c-nsp] MPLS - 6500's

2008-05-05 Thread Justin M. Streiner
On Mon, 5 May 2008, Paul Stewart wrote: > With a 6500 Catalyst, regular line cards, and Sup720-3BXL - what can you NOT > do with MPLS on these chassis? Is it "just" VPLS that requires an OSM card > or a FlexWAN card for example? > > We are working on a project where MPLS may come into play .. VPL

[c-nsp] MPLS - 6500's

2008-05-05 Thread Paul Stewart
This is a topic that has come up on the mailing list several times including from myself..;) Hopefully a simple question (been reading the archives for a couple of hours now). With a 6500 Catalyst, regular line cards, and Sup720-3BXL - what can you NOT do with MPLS on these chassis? Is it "just"