Re: [c-nsp] MPLS - MP-BPG with multiple OSPF areas

2011-10-24 Thread Mark Tinka
On Tuesday, October 25, 2011 08:37:39 AM Livio Zanol Puppim wrote: > Searching the Internet about this topic, I've found a > draft that seems to be a near future solution for some > major MPLS networks, called "seamless MPLS". As written > in the laymann draft ( > http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-i

Re: [c-nsp] MPLS - MP-BPG with multiple OSPF areas

2011-10-24 Thread Livio Zanol Puppim
Thank you very much for your answer. Searching the Internet about this topic, I've found a draft that seems to be a near future solution for some major MPLS networks, called "seamless MPLS". As written in the laymann draft ( http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-mpls-seamless-mpls-00.txt), the imple

Re: [c-nsp] MPLS - MP-BPG with multiple OSPF areas

2011-10-19 Thread Mark Tinka
On Thursday, October 20, 2011 06:39:38 AM Livio Zanol Puppim wrote: > About MPLS features in multiple areas, aren't there > solutions that can be implemented to overcome the > limitations like LDP prefix leaking or some solutions > with mGRE? The IGP already knows about the individual infrastruc

Re: [c-nsp] MPLS - MP-BPG with multiple OSPF areas

2011-10-19 Thread Mark Tinka
On Wednesday, October 19, 2011 09:33:38 AM Livio Zanol Puppim wrote: > We are planning to deploy a network with more than 200 PE > routers in a similar scenario, and I don't think that a > single OSPF area is a good choice for us. > > Can anybody help with some advice? IS-IS, if you're daring?

Re: [c-nsp] MPLS - MP-BPG with multiple OSPF areas

2011-10-19 Thread Livio Zanol Puppim
Message- > > From: Livio Zanol Puppim [mailto:livio.zanol.pup...@gmail.com] > > Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2011 5:53 AM > > To: David Prall > > Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] MPLS - MP-BPG with multiple OSPF areas > > > > You'r

Re: [c-nsp] MPLS - MP-BPG with multiple OSPF areas

2011-10-19 Thread David Prall
day, October 19, 2011 5:53 AM > To: David Prall > Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] MPLS - MP-BPG with multiple OSPF areas > > You're right David. There are out of order no packets, only > asynchronous traffic. Sorry about that... > > I don&#x

Re: [c-nsp] MPLS - MP-BPG with multiple OSPF areas

2011-10-19 Thread Vitkovsky, Adam
53 AM To: David Prall Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] MPLS - MP-BPG with multiple OSPF areas You're right David. There are out of order no packets, only asynchronous traffic. Sorry about that... I don't think that only the supression would do the job, since the loopbacks w

Re: [c-nsp] MPLS - MP-BPG with multiple OSPF areas

2011-10-19 Thread Livio Zanol Puppim
tech.com > > > > -Original Message- > > From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp- > > boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Livio Zanol Puppim > > Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2011 9:34 PM > > To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > > Subject: [c-nsp] MPLS -

Re: [c-nsp] MPLS - MP-BPG with multiple OSPF areas

2011-10-18 Thread David Prall
e- > From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp- > boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Livio Zanol Puppim > Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2011 9:34 PM > To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > Subject: [c-nsp] MPLS - MP-BPG with multiple OSPF areas > > Hello everybody, >

[c-nsp] MPLS - MP-BPG with multiple OSPF areas

2011-10-18 Thread Livio Zanol Puppim
Hello everybody, I have a doubt with a lab design that we are creating to test some MPLS topologies. I would like to know if anybody can help me solve a problem that I am facing about routing paths. To help ilustrate the topology I'm sending the image link below. https://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0