On Tuesday, October 25, 2011 08:37:39 AM Livio Zanol Puppim
wrote:
> Searching the Internet about this topic, I've found a
> draft that seems to be a near future solution for some
> major MPLS networks, called "seamless MPLS". As written
> in the laymann draft (
> http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-i
Thank you very much for your answer.
Searching the Internet about this topic, I've found a draft that seems to be
a near future solution for some major MPLS networks, called "seamless MPLS".
As written in the laymann draft (
http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-mpls-seamless-mpls-00.txt), the
imple
On Thursday, October 20, 2011 06:39:38 AM Livio Zanol Puppim
wrote:
> About MPLS features in multiple areas, aren't there
> solutions that can be implemented to overcome the
> limitations like LDP prefix leaking or some solutions
> with mGRE?
The IGP already knows about the individual infrastruc
On Wednesday, October 19, 2011 09:33:38 AM Livio Zanol
Puppim wrote:
> We are planning to deploy a network with more than 200 PE
> routers in a similar scenario, and I don't think that a
> single OSPF area is a good choice for us.
>
> Can anybody help with some advice?
IS-IS, if you're daring?
Message-
> > From: Livio Zanol Puppim [mailto:livio.zanol.pup...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2011 5:53 AM
> > To: David Prall
> > Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] MPLS - MP-BPG with multiple OSPF areas
> >
> > You'r
day, October 19, 2011 5:53 AM
> To: David Prall
> Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] MPLS - MP-BPG with multiple OSPF areas
>
> You're right David. There are out of order no packets, only
> asynchronous traffic. Sorry about that...
>
> I don
53 AM
To: David Prall
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] MPLS - MP-BPG with multiple OSPF areas
You're right David. There are out of order no packets, only asynchronous
traffic. Sorry about that...
I don't think that only the supression would do the job, since the loopbacks
w
tech.com
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-
> > boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Livio Zanol Puppim
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2011 9:34 PM
> > To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> > Subject: [c-nsp] MPLS -
e-
> From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-
> boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Livio Zanol Puppim
> Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2011 9:34 PM
> To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> Subject: [c-nsp] MPLS - MP-BPG with multiple OSPF areas
>
> Hello everybody,
>
Hello everybody,
I have a doubt with a lab design that we are creating to test some MPLS
topologies. I would like to know if anybody can help me solve a problem that
I am facing about routing paths. To help ilustrate the topology I'm sending
the image link below.
https://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0
10 matches
Mail list logo